Beyond Knowing How to Make It Work: The Conceptual Foundations of Designing
Saved in:
| Title: | Beyond Knowing How to Make It Work: The Conceptual Foundations of Designing |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Hope, Gill |
| Source: | Design and Technology Education. 2009 14(1):49-55. |
| Availability: | Design and Technology Education Association. 16 Wellesbourne House, Walton Road, Wellesbourne, Warwickshire, CV35 9JB, UK. Tel: +44-1789-470007; Fax: +44-1789-841995; e-mail: info@data.org.uk; Web site: http://www.data.org.uk |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 7 |
| Publication Date: | 2009 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Design, Technology Education, Practical Arts, Archaeology, Evolution, Creativity, Ability |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom |
| ISSN: | 1360-1431 |
| Abstract: | Gilbert Ryle (1949) divided knowledge into "know that" and "know how", which is neatly appealing to many design and technology educators, and like many writers on developing the curriculum, Kahney (1993) made a distinction between declarative knowledge: "verbal knowledge, that is, the kind you get from books, instructions and being told what to do." and procedural knowledge: "In order to achieve skilled performance you need to be able to translate declarative knowledge into actions. A new form of representation, known as procedural knowledge must be established. (p.91)" However, a curriculum that consists simply of information and techniques not only fails to reflect the original intentions of the creators of the UK National Curriculum for design and technology but also misses the mark in terms of developing creative and inventive minds. Evidence from such fields as cognitive archaeology (e.g. Renfrew, 1994) suggest that the symbiotic relationship between mind and hand that typifies technological action and innovation was a primary driver within human evolution. Thus designing technology is one of the defining characteristics of our species. Technology education, therefore, should not be seen simply from an instrumentalist viewpoint as a preparation for the world of work but as a preparation for full functionality in human society. A tentative taxonomy of the features of conceptual learning within technological action should, therefore, include those features that define our humanity and our distinctiveness from other species. These are identified as the ability to be self-reflective, to play with ideas, to make analogical connections between apparently disparate features and to indulge in leaps of the imagination. The contention is that if we fill up our curriculum with declarative and procedural knowledge, without acknowledging and encouraging the unique response or the innovative idea, then we will have designed a curriculum that, however hard we try, will never really succeed in "making it work" for many of our most creative pupils. (Contains 2 figures.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 26 |
| Entry Date: | 2010 |
| Accession Number: | EJ882740 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ882740 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ882740 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Beyond Knowing How to Make It Work: The Conceptual Foundations of Designing – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hope%2C+Gill%22">Hope, Gill</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Design+and+Technology+Education%22"><i>Design and Technology Education</i></searchLink>. 2009 14(1):49-55. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Design and Technology Education Association. 16 Wellesbourne House, Walton Road, Wellesbourne, Warwickshire, CV35 9JB, UK. Tel: +44-1789-470007; Fax: +44-1789-841995; e-mail: info@data.org.uk; Web site: http://www.data.org.uk – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 7 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2009 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Design%22">Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Education%22">Technology Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Practical+Arts%22">Practical Arts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Archaeology%22">Archaeology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evolution%22">Evolution</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Creativity%22">Creativity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ability%22">Ability</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1360-1431 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Gilbert Ryle (1949) divided knowledge into "know that" and "know how", which is neatly appealing to many design and technology educators, and like many writers on developing the curriculum, Kahney (1993) made a distinction between declarative knowledge: "verbal knowledge, that is, the kind you get from books, instructions and being told what to do." and procedural knowledge: "In order to achieve skilled performance you need to be able to translate declarative knowledge into actions. A new form of representation, known as procedural knowledge must be established. (p.91)" However, a curriculum that consists simply of information and techniques not only fails to reflect the original intentions of the creators of the UK National Curriculum for design and technology but also misses the mark in terms of developing creative and inventive minds. Evidence from such fields as cognitive archaeology (e.g. Renfrew, 1994) suggest that the symbiotic relationship between mind and hand that typifies technological action and innovation was a primary driver within human evolution. Thus designing technology is one of the defining characteristics of our species. Technology education, therefore, should not be seen simply from an instrumentalist viewpoint as a preparation for the world of work but as a preparation for full functionality in human society. A tentative taxonomy of the features of conceptual learning within technological action should, therefore, include those features that define our humanity and our distinctiveness from other species. These are identified as the ability to be self-reflective, to play with ideas, to make analogical connections between apparently disparate features and to indulge in leaps of the imagination. The contention is that if we fill up our curriculum with declarative and procedural knowledge, without acknowledging and encouraging the unique response or the innovative idea, then we will have designed a curriculum that, however hard we try, will never really succeed in "making it work" for many of our most creative pupils. (Contains 2 figures.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 26 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2010 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ882740 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ882740 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 49 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Design Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Practical Arts Type: general – SubjectFull: Archaeology Type: general – SubjectFull: Evolution Type: general – SubjectFull: Creativity Type: general – SubjectFull: Ability Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Beyond Knowing How to Make It Work: The Conceptual Foundations of Designing Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hope, Gill IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2009 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1360-1431 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 14 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Design and Technology Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
