The Role of Sensory Modality in Age-Related Distraction: A Critical Review and a Renewed View

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Role of Sensory Modality in Age-Related Distraction: A Critical Review and a Renewed View
Language: English
Authors: Guerreiro, Maria J. S., Murphy, Dana R., Van Gerven, Pascal W. M.
Source: Psychological Bulletin. Nov 2010 136(6):975-1022.
Availability: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
Peer Reviewed: Y
Physical Description: PDF
Page Count: 48
Publication Date: 2010
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Attention, Age Differences, Inhibition, Auditory Perception, Visual Perception, Change, Comparative Analysis
DOI: 10.1037/a0020731
ISSN: 0033-2909
Abstract: Selective attention requires the ability to focus on relevant information and to ignore irrelevant information. The ability to inhibit irrelevant information has been proposed to be the main source of age-related cognitive change (e.g., Hasher & Zacks, 1988). Although age-related distraction by irrelevant information has been extensively demonstrated in the visual modality, studies involving auditory and cross-modal paradigms have revealed a mixed pattern of results. A comparative evaluation of these paradigms according to sensory modality suggests a twofold trend: Age-related distraction is more likely (a) in unimodal than in cross-modal paradigms and (b) when irrelevant information is presented in the visual modality, rather than in the auditory modality. This distinct pattern of age-related changes in selective attention may be linked to the reliance of the visual and auditory modalities on different filtering mechanisms. Distractors presented through the auditory modality can be filtered at both central and peripheral neurocognitive levels. In contrast, distractors presented through the visual modality are primarily suppressed at more central levels of processing, which may be more vulnerable to aging. We propose the hypothesis that age-related distractibility is modality dependent, a notion that might need to be incorporated in current theories of cognitive aging. Ultimately, this might lead to a more accurate account for the mixed pattern of impaired and preserved selective attention found in advancing age. (Contains 9 tables and 2 footnotes.)
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 251
Entry Date: 2010
Accession Number: EJ903773
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ903773
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Role of Sensory Modality in Age-Related Distraction: A Critical Review and a Renewed View
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Guerreiro%2C+Maria+J%2E+S%2E%22">Guerreiro, Maria J. S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Murphy%2C+Dana+R%2E%22">Murphy, Dana R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Van+Gerven%2C+Pascal+W%2E+M%2E%22">Van Gerven, Pascal W. M.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Psychological+Bulletin%22"><i>Psychological Bulletin</i></searchLink>. Nov 2010 136(6):975-1022.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: PhysDesc
  Label: Physical Description
  Group: PhysDesc
  Data: PDF
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 48
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2010
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Evaluative
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attention%22">Attention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Age+Differences%22">Age Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inhibition%22">Inhibition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Auditory+Perception%22">Auditory Perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+Perception%22">Visual Perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change%22">Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1037/a0020731
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0033-2909
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Selective attention requires the ability to focus on relevant information and to ignore irrelevant information. The ability to inhibit irrelevant information has been proposed to be the main source of age-related cognitive change (e.g., Hasher & Zacks, 1988). Although age-related distraction by irrelevant information has been extensively demonstrated in the visual modality, studies involving auditory and cross-modal paradigms have revealed a mixed pattern of results. A comparative evaluation of these paradigms according to sensory modality suggests a twofold trend: Age-related distraction is more likely (a) in unimodal than in cross-modal paradigms and (b) when irrelevant information is presented in the visual modality, rather than in the auditory modality. This distinct pattern of age-related changes in selective attention may be linked to the reliance of the visual and auditory modalities on different filtering mechanisms. Distractors presented through the auditory modality can be filtered at both central and peripheral neurocognitive levels. In contrast, distractors presented through the visual modality are primarily suppressed at more central levels of processing, which may be more vulnerable to aging. We propose the hypothesis that age-related distractibility is modality dependent, a notion that might need to be incorporated in current theories of cognitive aging. Ultimately, this might lead to a more accurate account for the mixed pattern of impaired and preserved selective attention found in advancing age. (Contains 9 tables and 2 footnotes.)
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 251
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2010
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ903773
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ903773
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1037/a0020731
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 48
        StartPage: 975
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Attention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Age Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Inhibition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Auditory Perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Visual Perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Change
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Role of Sensory Modality in Age-Related Distraction: A Critical Review and a Renewed View
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Guerreiro, Maria J. S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Murphy, Dana R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Van Gerven, Pascal W. M.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Type: published
              Y: 2010
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0033-2909
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 136
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Psychological Bulletin
              Type: main
ResultId 1