What Is Nursing Home Quality and How Is It Measured?
Saved in:
| Title: | What Is Nursing Home Quality and How Is It Measured? |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Castle, Nicholas G., Ferguson, Jamie C. |
| Source: | Gerontologist. Aug 2010 50(4):426-442. |
| Availability: | Oxford University Press. Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, UK. Tel: +44-1865-353907; Fax: +44-1865-353485; e-mail: jnls.cust.serv@oxfordjournals.org; Web site: http://gerontologist.oxfordjournals.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 17 |
| Publication Date: | 2010 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Nursing Homes, Health Facilities, Certification, Gerontology, Residential Care, Evaluation, Comparative Analysis, Measurement, Models, Federal Programs, Health Insurance |
| DOI: | 10.1093/geront/gnq052 |
| ISSN: | 0016-9013 |
| Abstract: | Purpose: In this commentary, we examine nursing home quality and indicators that have been used to measure nursing home quality. Design and Methods: A brief review of the history of nursing home quality is presented that provides some context and insight into currently used quality indicators. Donabedian's structure, process, and outcome (SPO) model is used to frame the discussion. Current quality indicators and quality initiatives are discussed, including those included in the Facility Quality Indicator Profile Report, Nursing Home Compare, deficiency citations included as part of Medicare/Medicaid certification, and the Advancing Excellence Campaign. Results: Current quality indicators are presented as a mix of structural, process, and outcome measures, each of which has noted advantages and disadvantages. We speculate on steps that need to be taken in the future to address and potentially improve the quality of care provided by nursing homes, including report cards, pay for performance, market-based incentives, and policy developments in the certification process. Areas for future research are identified throughout the review. Implications: We conclude that improvements in nursing home quality have likely occurred, but improvements are still needed. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2011 |
| Accession Number: | EJ910484 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ910484 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: What Is Nursing Home Quality and How Is It Measured? – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Castle%2C+Nicholas+G%2E%22">Castle, Nicholas G.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ferguson%2C+Jamie+C%2E%22">Ferguson, Jamie C.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Gerontologist%22"><i>Gerontologist</i></searchLink>. Aug 2010 50(4):426-442. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Oxford University Press. Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, UK. Tel: +44-1865-353907; Fax: +44-1865-353485; e-mail: jnls.cust.serv@oxfordjournals.org; Web site: http://gerontologist.oxfordjournals.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: PhysDesc Label: Physical Description Group: PhysDesc Data: PDF – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 17 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2010 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nursing+Homes%22">Nursing Homes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+Facilities%22">Health Facilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Certification%22">Certification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gerontology%22">Gerontology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Residential+Care%22">Residential Care</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation%22">Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement%22">Measurement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Programs%22">Federal Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+Insurance%22">Health Insurance</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1093/geront/gnq052 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0016-9013 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: In this commentary, we examine nursing home quality and indicators that have been used to measure nursing home quality. Design and Methods: A brief review of the history of nursing home quality is presented that provides some context and insight into currently used quality indicators. Donabedian's structure, process, and outcome (SPO) model is used to frame the discussion. Current quality indicators and quality initiatives are discussed, including those included in the Facility Quality Indicator Profile Report, Nursing Home Compare, deficiency citations included as part of Medicare/Medicaid certification, and the Advancing Excellence Campaign. Results: Current quality indicators are presented as a mix of structural, process, and outcome measures, each of which has noted advantages and disadvantages. We speculate on steps that need to be taken in the future to address and potentially improve the quality of care provided by nursing homes, including report cards, pay for performance, market-based incentives, and policy developments in the certification process. Areas for future research are identified throughout the review. Implications: We conclude that improvements in nursing home quality have likely occurred, but improvements are still needed. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2011 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ910484 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ910484 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1093/geront/gnq052 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 426 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Nursing Homes Type: general – SubjectFull: Health Facilities Type: general – SubjectFull: Certification Type: general – SubjectFull: Gerontology Type: general – SubjectFull: Residential Care Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Measurement Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Health Insurance Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: What Is Nursing Home Quality and How Is It Measured? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Castle, Nicholas G. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ferguson, Jamie C. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Type: published Y: 2010 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0016-9013 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 50 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Gerontologist Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |