The Effect of Prompting to Students with Different Learning Styles
Saved in:
| Title: | The Effect of Prompting to Students with Different Learning Styles |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Papadopoulos, Pantelis M., Demetriadis, Stavros N., Stamelos, Ioannis G., Tsoukalas, Ioannis A. |
| Source: | Multicultural Education & Technology Journal. 2010 4(3):198-213. |
| Availability: | Emerald. One Mifflin Place Suite 400, Harvard Square, Cambridge, MA 02138. Tel: 617-576-5782; e-mail: america@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emeraldinsight.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 16 |
| Publication Date: | 2010 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education |
| Descriptors: | Cognitive Style, Student Attitudes, Prompting, Predictor Variables, Educational Technology, Task Analysis, Pretests Posttests, Web Based Instruction, Instructional Design, Scaffolding (Teaching Technique), Intervention, Undergraduate Students, Measures (Individuals) |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Learning Style Inventory |
| DOI: | 10.1108/17504971011075192 |
| ISSN: | 1750-497X |
| Abstract: | Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of question prompts on student learning in relation to their learning styles. The context of the study is technology-enhanced learning in an ill-structured domain. Design/methodology/approach: The study conditions were the same for all the students in the four learning style groups. Student learning style was the independent variable, while students' attitudes and task performance were the dependent variables of the study. Pre-test treatment post-test method was used. Students studied in a web-based learning environment during treatment. Findings: The integration of question prompts as student supporting tool in technology-enhanced learning environments might not improve learning for all students alike independent of their learning styles. Research limitations/implications: Small uneven groups because the researcher has no control over the student distribution across the different learning style profiles. Practical implications: The suggestion for designers is to consider combining prompting with other scaffolding methods, in order to effectively support all students independent of their learning styles. Originality/value: The paper combines learning in ill-structured domains through cases and a scaffolding method based on question prompts focusing on contextual elements. The results of the study inform the designers of TELEs that although prompting can be generally helpful, parameters such as the students' learning style are able to limit the cognitive benefit emerging from the prompting intervention. (Contains 2 tables.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 59 |
| Entry Date: | 2011 |
| Accession Number: | EJ921903 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ921903 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Effect of Prompting to Students with Different Learning Styles – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Papadopoulos%2C+Pantelis+M%2E%22">Papadopoulos, Pantelis M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Demetriadis%2C+Stavros+N%2E%22">Demetriadis, Stavros N.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stamelos%2C+Ioannis+G%2E%22">Stamelos, Ioannis G.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tsoukalas%2C+Ioannis+A%2E%22">Tsoukalas, Ioannis A.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Multicultural+Education+%26+Technology+Journal%22"><i>Multicultural Education & Technology Journal</i></searchLink>. 2010 4(3):198-213. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Emerald. One Mifflin Place Suite 400, Harvard Square, Cambridge, MA 02138. Tel: 617-576-5782; e-mail: america@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emeraldinsight.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 16 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2010 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Style%22">Cognitive Style</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prompting%22">Prompting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predictor+Variables%22">Predictor Variables</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Technology%22">Educational Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+Analysis%22">Task Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pretests+Posttests%22">Pretests Posttests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Web+Based+Instruction%22">Web Based Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Design%22">Instructional Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scaffolding+%28Teaching+Technique%29%22">Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intervention%22">Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measures+%28Individuals%29%22">Measures (Individuals)</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Learning+Style+Inventory%22">Learning Style Inventory</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1108/17504971011075192 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1750-497X – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of question prompts on student learning in relation to their learning styles. The context of the study is technology-enhanced learning in an ill-structured domain. Design/methodology/approach: The study conditions were the same for all the students in the four learning style groups. Student learning style was the independent variable, while students' attitudes and task performance were the dependent variables of the study. Pre-test treatment post-test method was used. Students studied in a web-based learning environment during treatment. Findings: The integration of question prompts as student supporting tool in technology-enhanced learning environments might not improve learning for all students alike independent of their learning styles. Research limitations/implications: Small uneven groups because the researcher has no control over the student distribution across the different learning style profiles. Practical implications: The suggestion for designers is to consider combining prompting with other scaffolding methods, in order to effectively support all students independent of their learning styles. Originality/value: The paper combines learning in ill-structured domains through cases and a scaffolding method based on question prompts focusing on contextual elements. The results of the study inform the designers of TELEs that although prompting can be generally helpful, parameters such as the students' learning style are able to limit the cognitive benefit emerging from the prompting intervention. (Contains 2 tables.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 59 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2011 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ921903 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ921903 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1108/17504971011075192 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 198 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Cognitive Style Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Prompting Type: general – SubjectFull: Predictor Variables Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Task Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Pretests Posttests Type: general – SubjectFull: Web Based Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Design Type: general – SubjectFull: Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) Type: general – SubjectFull: Intervention Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Measures (Individuals) Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Style Inventory Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Effect of Prompting to Students with Different Learning Styles Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Papadopoulos, Pantelis M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Demetriadis, Stavros N. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stamelos, Ioannis G. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tsoukalas, Ioannis A. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2010 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1750-497X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 4 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Multicultural Education & Technology Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |