On the Difficulty of Relational Concepts among Participants with Down Syndrome

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: On the Difficulty of Relational Concepts among Participants with Down Syndrome
Language: English
Authors: Facon, Bruno, Magis, David, Courbois, Yannick
Source: Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal. Jan-Feb 2012 33(1):60-68.
Availability: Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 9
Publication Date: 2012
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Down Syndrome, Children, Test Items, Difficulty Level, Test Bias, Mental Retardation, Item Analysis
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Boehm Test of Basic Concepts
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.014
ISSN: 0891-4222
Abstract: The aim of the study was to compare the difficulty of relational concepts among participants with and without intellectual disability. The French versions of the Boehm Tests of Basic Concepts Third Edition (Preschool and Kindergarten to 2nd grade) were administered to three groups of 47 participants individually matched on their total raw score on the tests. The first group comprised participants with intellectual disability of undifferentiated etiology, the second, participants with Down syndrome and the third, typical children. Item analyses using the transformed item difficulties method to detect differential item functioning across groups showed that the groups' rank-orders of item difficulty were highly similar. It is concluded that, all things being equal, relational concepts are of comparable difficulty and follow a similar sequence of development whatever the cognitive and etiological status of participants. Methodological and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed. (Contains 2 figures and 1 table.)
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2011
Accession Number: EJ947552
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ947552
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: On the Difficulty of Relational Concepts among Participants with Down Syndrome
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Facon%2C+Bruno%22">Facon, Bruno</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Magis%2C+David%22">Magis, David</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Courbois%2C+Yannick%22">Courbois, Yannick</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Research+in+Developmental+Disabilities%3A+A+Multidisciplinary+Journal%22"><i>Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal</i></searchLink>. Jan-Feb 2012 33(1):60-68.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 9
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2012
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Down+Syndrome%22">Down Syndrome</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Children%22">Children</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Items%22">Test Items</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Difficulty+Level%22">Difficulty Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Bias%22">Test Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+Retardation%22">Mental Retardation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Item+Analysis%22">Item Analysis</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectThesaurus
  Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Boehm+Test+of+Basic+Concepts%22">Boehm Test of Basic Concepts</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.014
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0891-4222
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The aim of the study was to compare the difficulty of relational concepts among participants with and without intellectual disability. The French versions of the Boehm Tests of Basic Concepts Third Edition (Preschool and Kindergarten to 2nd grade) were administered to three groups of 47 participants individually matched on their total raw score on the tests. The first group comprised participants with intellectual disability of undifferentiated etiology, the second, participants with Down syndrome and the third, typical children. Item analyses using the transformed item difficulties method to detect differential item functioning across groups showed that the groups' rank-orders of item difficulty were highly similar. It is concluded that, all things being equal, relational concepts are of comparable difficulty and follow a similar sequence of development whatever the cognitive and etiological status of participants. Methodological and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed. (Contains 2 figures and 1 table.)
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2011
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ947552
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ947552
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.014
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 60
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Down Syndrome
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Children
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Items
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Difficulty Level
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Bias
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental Retardation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Item Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Boehm Test of Basic Concepts
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: On the Difficulty of Relational Concepts among Participants with Down Syndrome
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Facon, Bruno
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Magis, David
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Courbois, Yannick
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2012
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0891-4222
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 33
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal
              Type: main
ResultId 1