Internal Evaluation, Historically Speaking
Saved in:
| Title: | Internal Evaluation, Historically Speaking |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mathison, Sandra |
| Source: | New Directions for Evaluation. Win 2011 (132):13-23. |
| Availability: | Jossey-Bass. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774. Tel: 800-825-7550; Tel: 201-748-6645; Fax: 201-748-6021; e-mail: subinfo@wiley.com; Web site: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/browse/?type=JOURNAL |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 11 |
| Publication Date: | 2011 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Program Evaluation, Accountability, Public Administration, Political Attitudes, Trend Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Evaluation Methods, Self Evaluation (Groups), Organizational Effectiveness, Policy Formation, Policy Analysis, Administrative Policy, Administrative Principles, Public Policy, Public Sector, Federal Programs, United States History, Outsourcing, Federal Regulation |
| Geographic Terms: | Australia, Canada, France, United Kingdom, United States |
| Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: | Government Performance and Results Act 1993, No Child Left Behind Act 2001 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/ev.393 |
| ISSN: | 1097-6736 |
| Abstract: | The author analyzes the growth and nature of internal evaluation from the 1960s to the present and suggests that internal evaluation has been on the increase because of its perceived importance. Although the 1960s were characterized by a rich intellectual development of evaluation theory and practice, the fiscal conservatism of the 1980s ushered in evaluation practice focused more specifically on cost effectiveness. During that time, internal evaluation began to increase. In the 1990s this trend continued and was intensified by the reinvention of government known as the New Public Management. The author argues that in this results-oriented neoliberal context, evaluation is maintained as an internal function, but focuses primarily on descriptive accounts of performance. The chapter concludes with some speculation about the nature of future internal evaluation. (Contains 1 figure.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 35 |
| Entry Date: | 2012 |
| Accession Number: | EJ952782 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwENbxSxkRd_uF9strH4G23OAAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDGZRep-FsMhnWOtcyAIBEICBmqkU6xJ6v_9TEE12bgt1vKVAEmmFF2M0AEHVBYRBZF-PgtwVRwCCMKhU4jVk51Ye0NhiPf8LONY4Su5iGxkIIcByrTYN23a-YrcJnIs_FF28hRsM1ybghHCxcZPsdS4iXWuqIO11DxYW895v_yACguSTx5M4TDCfv4ljLvKmhaUM9jAzbBvNctWxFwkdMV_RLcOou6Or-PlranY= Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ952782 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Internal Evaluation, Historically Speaking – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mathison%2C+Sandra%22">Mathison, Sandra</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22New+Directions+for+Evaluation%22"><i>New Directions for Evaluation</i></searchLink>. Win 2011 (132):13-23. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Jossey-Bass. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774. Tel: 800-825-7550; Tel: 201-748-6645; Fax: 201-748-6021; e-mail: subinfo@wiley.com; Web site: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/browse/?type=JOURNAL – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 11 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2011 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Administration%22">Public Administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+Attitudes%22">Political Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trend+Analysis%22">Trend Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cost+Effectiveness%22">Cost Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Evaluation+%28Groups%29%22">Self Evaluation (Groups)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+Effectiveness%22">Organizational Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+Formation%22">Policy Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+Analysis%22">Policy Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrative+Policy%22">Administrative Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrative+Principles%22">Administrative Principles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Policy%22">Public Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Sector%22">Public Sector</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Programs%22">Federal Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States+History%22">United States History</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outsourcing%22">Outsourcing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Regulation%22">Federal Regulation</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Canada%22">Canada</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22France%22">France</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Government+Performance+and+Results+Act+1993%22">Government Performance and Results Act 1993</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22No+Child+Left+Behind+Act+2001%22">No Child Left Behind Act 2001</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/ev.393 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1097-6736 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The author analyzes the growth and nature of internal evaluation from the 1960s to the present and suggests that internal evaluation has been on the increase because of its perceived importance. Although the 1960s were characterized by a rich intellectual development of evaluation theory and practice, the fiscal conservatism of the 1980s ushered in evaluation practice focused more specifically on cost effectiveness. During that time, internal evaluation began to increase. In the 1990s this trend continued and was intensified by the reinvention of government known as the New Public Management. The author argues that in this results-oriented neoliberal context, evaluation is maintained as an internal function, but focuses primarily on descriptive accounts of performance. The chapter concludes with some speculation about the nature of future internal evaluation. (Contains 1 figure.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 35 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2012 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ952782 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ952782 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/ev.393 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 13 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Administration Type: general – SubjectFull: Political Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Trend Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Cost Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Evaluation (Groups) Type: general – SubjectFull: Organizational Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Policy Formation Type: general – SubjectFull: Policy Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrative Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrative Principles Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Sector Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: United States History Type: general – SubjectFull: Outsourcing Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Regulation Type: general – SubjectFull: Australia Type: general – SubjectFull: Canada Type: general – SubjectFull: France Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general – SubjectFull: United States Type: general – SubjectFull: Government Performance and Results Act 1993 Type: general – SubjectFull: No Child Left Behind Act 2001 Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Internal Evaluation, Historically Speaking Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mathison, Sandra IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2011 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1097-6736 Numbering: – Type: issue Value: 132 Titles: – TitleFull: New Directions for Evaluation Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |