Burger, R. L., Lane, K. E., & Cooke, C. A. (2017). A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTARY BY KAREN OLSEN BRUHNS, WILLIAM E. BROOKS, AND DEBORAH TRUHAN ON “ECUADORIAN CINNABAR AND THE PREHISPANIC TRADE IN VERMILION PIGMENT: VIABLE HYPOTHESIS OR RED HERRING?”. Latin American Antiquity, 28(4), 611. https://doi.org/10.1017/laq.2017.47
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationBurger, Richard L., Kris E. Lane, and Colin A. Cooke. "A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTARY BY KAREN OLSEN BRUHNS, WILLIAM E. BROOKS, AND DEBORAH TRUHAN ON “ECUADORIAN CINNABAR AND THE PREHISPANIC TRADE IN VERMILION PIGMENT: VIABLE HYPOTHESIS OR RED HERRING?”." Latin American Antiquity 28, no. 4 (2017): 611. https://doi.org/10.1017/laq.2017.47.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationBurger, Richard L., et al. "A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTARY BY KAREN OLSEN BRUHNS, WILLIAM E. BROOKS, AND DEBORAH TRUHAN ON “ECUADORIAN CINNABAR AND THE PREHISPANIC TRADE IN VERMILION PIGMENT: VIABLE HYPOTHESIS OR RED HERRING?”." Latin American Antiquity, vol. 28, no. 4, 2017, p. 611, https://doi.org/10.1017/laq.2017.47.