Anticoncepción y bioética: entre la objeción de conciencia y el principio de autonomía.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Anticoncepción y bioética: entre la objeción de conciencia y el principio de autonomía.
Alternate Title:	Contraception and bioethics: between the conscience objection and the autonomy principle.
Authors:	Neyro-Bilbao, José Luis¹ jlneyro@sego.es, Elorriaga, Miguel Ángel¹, Lira-Plascencia, Josefina²
Source:	Ginecología y Obstetricia de México. Feb2015, Vol. 83 Issue 2, p125-138. 14p.
Subjects:	MEDICAL ethics, PHYSICIAN-patient relations, AUTONOMY (Psychology), MEDICAL decision making, ACCESS to information, CONTRACEPTION, ABORTION & ethics, PHYSICIANS' attitudes, ETHICS
Abstract (English):	In recent years, in all Western societies has changed the paradigm of the physician-patient relationship. It has passed from the principle of beneficence and abscence of malificence to the patients autonomy, recognizing their sovereignty in making clinical decisions that directly affect them. Occasionally, this principle can clash with certain bioethical aspects of conscientious objection for health professionals and providers, primarily in the areas of contraception and abortion. We discussed aspects that support one or another attitude emphasizing issues relating to contraception and induced abortion and the access and use of contraceptive methods by adolescents recognized as “mature minors" to issues of sexuality, particularly in Spain and Mexico. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish):	En los últimos años, en todas las sociedades occidentales se ha modificado el paradigma de la relación médico-paciente. Se ha pasado del principio de beneficencia y del de ausencia de maleficencia, al de autonomía del paciente al reconocer la soberanía de aquél en la toma de decisiones clínicas que le afecten directamente. En ocasiones, este principio puede entrar en colisión con determinados aspectos bioéticos relativos a la objeción de conciencia de los profesionales de la salud, como en los temas de anticoncepción y aborto. Se debate acerca de los aspectos que sostienen una u otra actitud insistiendo en los temas de anticoncepción y referidos al aborto inducido y al acceso y empleo de métodos anticonceptivos por los adolescentes, reconocidos como “menores maduros" para temas de sexualidad. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Ginecología y Obstetricia de México is the property of Federacion Mexicana de Ginecologia y Obstetricia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	MedicLatina

Description
Abstract:	In recent years, in all Western societies has changed the paradigm of the physician-patient relationship. It has passed from the principle of beneficence and abscence of malificence to the patients autonomy, recognizing their sovereignty in making clinical decisions that directly affect them. Occasionally, this principle can clash with certain bioethical aspects of conscientious objection for health professionals and providers, primarily in the areas of contraception and abortion. We discussed aspects that support one or another attitude emphasizing issues relating to contraception and induced abortion and the access and use of contraceptive methods by adolescents recognized as “mature minors" to issues of sexuality, particularly in Spain and Mexico. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	03009041