How to improve adherence the captors of phosphorus on hemodialysis: Experience in real life with sucroferric oxyhydroxide.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: How to improve adherence the captors of phosphorus on hemodialysis: Experience in real life with sucroferric oxyhydroxide.
Alternate Title: Cómo mejorar la adherencia a los captores del fosforo en hemodiálisis: experiencia en vía real con oxihidróxido sucroférrico.
Authors: Jiménez, M. Dolores Arenas1,2 lola@olemiswebs.com, González, Juan Francisco Navarro3
Source: Nefrologia. Nov/Dec2020, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p640-646. 7p.
Subjects: HEMODIALYSIS patients, PATIENT preferences, PHOSPHORUS, DRUG side effects, PHYSICIAN-patient relations
Abstract (English): Introduction: The lack of adherence to phosphate -binders (PB) is the most important factor in not achieving the objectives of serum phosphorus (sP). Studies in the real-world population are needed to understand the influence of PBs on adherence and how to modify it. Methods: Prospective study conducted during 3 months in usual clinical practice. Out of 105 hemodialysis patients, 57 were switched to SFOH and 48 maintained their baseline treatment (control group). sP levels and the percentage of patients with sP levels <5 mg/dl were compared. Adherence before and after introduction of SFOH, number of pills of PB, preferences in the administration mode and side effects were analyzed. Results: The percentage of patients with controlled sP (<5 mg/dl) increased significantly in the SFOH users' group (62.1-92.9%, p < 0.001), but not in the control group (83-83.3%, p = NS). The average of daily tablets decreased significantly in the SFOH group (7.2-2.3 comp, p < 0.001), but not in the control group (5.6-5.6, p = NS) and 100% of the patients used only one PB in SFOH group. The use of SFOH increased the adherence according to the SMAQ questionnaire (57.8-84.3%; OR 13.1, p < 0.001). The possibility to choose the preferred mode of administration (split-swallowing 89% compared to chewing 11%), improved the acceptance (44.7-78%). 14% of the patients experienced side effects and in 5.2% SFOH was discontinued for this reason. Conclusions: SFOH controlled serum sP in 93% of patients, 100% in monotherapy, and with fewer tablets. The exploration and adaptation of preferences in the mode of administration influenced the acceptance of the drug by the patient and, probably, the future adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): Introducción: La falta de adherencia a los captores del fósforo es el factor más importante para no lograr los objetivos del fósforo sérico (Ps). Se necesitan estudios en la población del mundo real para comprender la influencia de los CP sobre la adherencia y como modificarla. Objetivos Evaluar la eficacia y la adherencia de un nuevo CP, oxihidróxido sucroférrico (OHSF) en pacientes en hemodiálisis y la influencia de un cambio en el modo de administración del fármaco sobre la aceptación del mismo. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo realizado durante 3 meses en práctica clínica habitual. De 105 pacientes de hemodiálisis, 57 pacientes con P mal controlado (p < 5 mg/dl) fueron cambiados a OHSF y 48 mantuvieron su tratamiento inicial (grupo control). Se compararon los niveles de Ps y el porcentaje de pacientes con niveles de Ps < 5 mg/dl. Se analizó la adherencia antes y después de la introducción de OHSF, el número de comprimidos de captores del P, los efectos secundarios y el grado de aceptación del fármaco tras ofrecer varias alternativas en el modo de administración. Resultados: El porcentaje de pacientes con P controlado (<5 mg/dl) aumentó significativamente a los 3 meses de seguimiento en el grupo de pacientes con OHSF (62,1 al 92,9%; p < 0,001), pero no en el grupo de control (83 al 83,3%; p = NS). El promedio de comprimidos diarios disminuyó significativamente en el grupo OHSF (7,2 a 2,3 comprimidos; p < 0,001), pero no en el grupo control (5,6 a 5,6; p = NS) y todos los pacientes en tratamiento con OHSF se controlaron con monoterapia. El uso de OHSF aumentó la adherencia según el cuestionario SMAQ (57,8 al 84,3%; OR: 13,1; p < 0,001). La posibilidad de elegir el modo de administración preferido (cortar-tragar 89% en comparación con masticar 11%) mejoró la aceptación (44,7 al 78%) de los pacientes. El 14% de los pacientes experimentaron efectos secundarios y en 5,2% se suspendió el OHSF por esta razón. Conclusiones: OHSF controló el P sérico en el 93% de los pacientes, siendo la totalidad de ellos en monoterapia, y con menor número de comprimidos a corto plazo. La exploración y adaptación de las preferencias en el modo de administración influyó en la aceptación del fármaco por parte del paciente y, probablemente en la adherencia futura. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Nefrologia is the property of Revista Nefrologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: MedicLatina
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: lth
DbLabel: MedicLatina
An: 147354788
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: How to improve adherence the captors of phosphorus on hemodialysis: Experience in real life with sucroferric oxyhydroxide.
– Name: TitleAlt
  Label: Alternate Title
  Group: TiAlt
  Data: C&#243;mo mejorar la adherencia a los captores del fosforo en hemodi&#225;lisis: experiencia en v&#237;a real con oxihidr&#243;xido sucrof&#233;rrico.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Jim&#233;nez%2C+M%2E+Dolores+Arenas%22&quot;&gt;Jim&#233;nez, M. Dolores Arenas&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1,2&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;i&gt; lola@olemiswebs.com&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Gonz&#225;lez%2C+Juan+Francisco+Navarro%22&quot;&gt;Gonz&#225;lez, Juan Francisco Navarro&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;3&lt;/relatesTo&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Nefrologia%22&quot;&gt;Nefrologia&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Nov/Dec2020, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p640-646. 7p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22HEMODIALYSIS+patients%22&quot;&gt;HEMODIALYSIS patients&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22PATIENT+preferences%22&quot;&gt;PATIENT preferences&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22PHOSPHORUS%22&quot;&gt;PHOSPHORUS&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22DRUG+side+effects%22&quot;&gt;DRUG side effects&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22PHYSICIAN-patient+relations%22&quot;&gt;PHYSICIAN-patient relations&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (English)
  Group: Ab
  Data: Introduction: The lack of adherence to phosphate -binders (PB) is the most important factor in not achieving the objectives of serum phosphorus (sP). Studies in the real-world population are needed to understand the influence of PBs on adherence and how to modify it. Methods: Prospective study conducted during 3 months in usual clinical practice. Out of 105 hemodialysis patients, 57 were switched to SFOH and 48 maintained their baseline treatment (control group). sP levels and the percentage of patients with sP levels &lt;5 mg/dl were compared. Adherence before and after introduction of SFOH, number of pills of PB, preferences in the administration mode and side effects were analyzed. Results: The percentage of patients with controlled sP (&lt;5 mg/dl) increased significantly in the SFOH users&#39; group (62.1-92.9%, p &lt; 0.001), but not in the control group (83-83.3%, p = NS). The average of daily tablets decreased significantly in the SFOH group (7.2-2.3 comp, p &lt; 0.001), but not in the control group (5.6-5.6, p = NS) and 100% of the patients used only one PB in SFOH group. The use of SFOH increased the adherence according to the SMAQ questionnaire (57.8-84.3%; OR 13.1, p &lt; 0.001). The possibility to choose the preferred mode of administration (split-swallowing 89% compared to chewing 11%), improved the acceptance (44.7-78%). 14% of the patients experienced side effects and in 5.2% SFOH was discontinued for this reason. Conclusions: SFOH controlled serum sP in 93% of patients, 100% in monotherapy, and with fewer tablets. The exploration and adaptation of preferences in the mode of administration influenced the acceptance of the drug by the patient and, probably, the future adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (Spanish)
  Group: Ab
  Data: Introducci&#243;n: La falta de adherencia a los captores del f&#243;sforo es el factor m&#225;s importante para no lograr los objetivos del f&#243;sforo s&#233;rico (Ps). Se necesitan estudios en la poblaci&#243;n del mundo real para comprender la influencia de los CP sobre la adherencia y como modificarla. Objetivos Evaluar la eficacia y la adherencia de un nuevo CP, oxihidr&#243;xido sucrof&#233;rrico (OHSF) en pacientes en hemodi&#225;lisis y la influencia de un cambio en el modo de administraci&#243;n del f&#225;rmaco sobre la aceptaci&#243;n del mismo. M&#233;todos: Estudio prospectivo realizado durante 3 meses en pr&#225;ctica cl&#237;nica habitual. De 105 pacientes de hemodi&#225;lisis, 57 pacientes con P mal controlado (p &lt; 5 mg/dl) fueron cambiados a OHSF y 48 mantuvieron su tratamiento inicial (grupo control). Se compararon los niveles de Ps y el porcentaje de pacientes con niveles de Ps &lt; 5 mg/dl. Se analiz&#243; la adherencia antes y despu&#233;s de la introducci&#243;n de OHSF, el n&#250;mero de comprimidos de captores del P, los efectos secundarios y el grado de aceptaci&#243;n del f&#225;rmaco tras ofrecer varias alternativas en el modo de administraci&#243;n. Resultados: El porcentaje de pacientes con P controlado (&lt;5 mg/dl) aument&#243; significativamente a los 3 meses de seguimiento en el grupo de pacientes con OHSF (62,1 al 92,9%; p &lt; 0,001), pero no en el grupo de control (83 al 83,3%; p = NS). El promedio de comprimidos diarios disminuy&#243; significativamente en el grupo OHSF (7,2 a 2,3 comprimidos; p &lt; 0,001), pero no en el grupo control (5,6 a 5,6; p = NS) y todos los pacientes en tratamiento con OHSF se controlaron con monoterapia. El uso de OHSF aument&#243; la adherencia seg&#250;n el cuestionario SMAQ (57,8 al 84,3%; OR: 13,1; p &lt; 0,001). La posibilidad de elegir el modo de administraci&#243;n preferido (cortar-tragar 89% en comparaci&#243;n con masticar 11%) mejor&#243; la aceptaci&#243;n (44,7 al 78%) de los pacientes. El 14% de los pacientes experimentaron efectos secundarios y en 5,2% se suspendi&#243; el OHSF por esta raz&#243;n. Conclusiones: OHSF control&#243; el P s&#233;rico en el 93% de los pacientes, siendo la totalidad de ellos en monoterapia, y con menor n&#250;mero de comprimidos a corto plazo. La exploraci&#243;n y adaptaci&#243;n de las preferencias en el modo de administraci&#243;n influy&#243; en la aceptaci&#243;n del f&#225;rmaco por parte del paciente y, probablemente en la adherencia futura. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Nefrologia is the property of Revista Nefrologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=lth&AN=147354788
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.nefro.2020.04.011
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 640
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: HEMODIALYSIS patients
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: PATIENT preferences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: PHOSPHORUS
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: DRUG side effects
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: PHYSICIAN-patient relations
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: How to improve adherence the captors of phosphorus on hemodialysis: Experience in real life with sucroferric oxyhydroxide.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jiménez, M. Dolores Arenas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: González, Juan Francisco Navarro
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov/Dec2020
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 02116995
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 40
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Nefrologia
              Type: main
ResultId 1