Certificado-dictamen de lesiones. Estudio de un caso.
Saved in:
| Title: | Certificado-dictamen de lesiones. Estudio de un caso. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | Certificate-opinion of injuries. Case study. |
| Authors: | García Garduza, Ismael1 ismaelgarciagarduza@yahoo.com.mx |
| Source: | Revista CONAMED. ene-mar2022, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p41-52. 12p. |
| Abstract (English): | Introduction: The clinical doctor must know how injuries should be described and the forensic doctor, attached to the Public Ministry Agency, must also know how to structure the certificate-opinion of injuries, applying his knowledge through the scientific method in the examination of people (complainants and accused) according to the way it is done in forensic medicine and medical-clinical procedures (based on propaedeutics and semiology). Its use will allow you to identify, describe, interpret, diagnose and issue your conclusions about the perceived injuries and in the structuring of the certificate-opinion. Such capabilities are essential in the work of any forensic doctor; however, there are cases in which the certificates-opinions are incomplete and inadequate, so it is essential to review these procedures. The certificates-opinions constitute decisive evidence during criminal proceeding for the investigation of crimes by injuries; that is why the poor preparation of such certificates-opinions can lead to inaccuracies during the investigation, as well as to the discredit of the medical-forensic expert, as well as seriously harm the legal interpretation of the injuries and, therefore, those involved. Conclusion: One of the controversies caused by the medical-forensic evidence on the injuries that the people involved in a trial, is their inappropriate, inaccurate description or that the diagnosis is based on symptoms without clinical livelihood, or supported by laboratory studies and cabinet, causing that the conclusions of experts and investigative authorities, are wrong at the time of issuing their opinions or resolutions, respectively, affecting the imparting of justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | Introducción: El médico clínico debe conocer cómo se deben describir las lesiones y el médico forense, adscrito a la Agencia del Ministerio Público (MP), además, debe saber estructurar el certificado-dictamen de lesiones, aplicando sus conocimientos a través del método científico en el examen de personas (denunciantes e imputados) acorde con la forma que se hace en los procedimientos médico-forense y médico-clínico (con base en la propedéutica y la semiología). Su empleo le permitirá identificar, describir, interpretar, diagnosticar y emitir sus conclusiones sobre las lesiones percibidas y en la estructuración del certificado-dictamen. Tales capacidades son fundamentales en el trabajo de cualquier médico forense, no obstante, se dan los casos en los que los certificados-dictámenes se realizan de forma incompleta e inadecuada, por lo que resulta indispensable hacer una revisión de estos procedimientos. Los certificados-dictámenes constituyen una prueba determinante durante las etapas del proceso penal en la investigación de delitos de lesiones; es por ello que la elaboración deficiente de tales certificados-dictámenes puede conllevar tanto a imprecisiones durante la investigación como al descrédito del perito médico forense, así como perjudicar gravemente la interpretación jurídica de las lesiones y, por ende, a los involucrados. Conclusión: Una de las controversias provocadas por la evidencia médico-forense sobre las lesiones que presenten las personas involucradas en un juicio es su descripción inapropiada, inexacta o que el diagnóstico esté basado en síntomas sin sustento clínico ni apoyado en estudios de laboratorio y gabinete, lo que origina que las conclusiones de peritos y autoridades investigadoras resulten equivocadas al momento de emitir sus dictámenes o resoluciones, respectivamente, afectando con ello la impartición de justicia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Revista CONAMED is the property of Comision Nacional de Arbitraje Medico and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | MedicLatina |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: lth DbLabel: MedicLatina An: 156458987 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Certificado-dictamen de lesiones. Estudio de un caso. – Name: TitleAlt Label: Alternate Title Group: TiAlt Data: Certificate-opinion of injuries. Case study. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22García+Garduza%2C+Ismael%22">García Garduza, Ismael</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> ismaelgarciagarduza@yahoo.com.mx</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Revista+CONAMED%22">Revista CONAMED</searchLink>. ene-mar2022, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p41-52. 12p. – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (English) Group: Ab Data: Introduction: The clinical doctor must know how injuries should be described and the forensic doctor, attached to the Public Ministry Agency, must also know how to structure the certificate-opinion of injuries, applying his knowledge through the scientific method in the examination of people (complainants and accused) according to the way it is done in forensic medicine and medical-clinical procedures (based on propaedeutics and semiology). Its use will allow you to identify, describe, interpret, diagnose and issue your conclusions about the perceived injuries and in the structuring of the certificate-opinion. Such capabilities are essential in the work of any forensic doctor; however, there are cases in which the certificates-opinions are incomplete and inadequate, so it is essential to review these procedures. The certificates-opinions constitute decisive evidence during criminal proceeding for the investigation of crimes by injuries; that is why the poor preparation of such certificates-opinions can lead to inaccuracies during the investigation, as well as to the discredit of the medical-forensic expert, as well as seriously harm the legal interpretation of the injuries and, therefore, those involved. Conclusion: One of the controversies caused by the medical-forensic evidence on the injuries that the people involved in a trial, is their inappropriate, inaccurate description or that the diagnosis is based on symptoms without clinical livelihood, or supported by laboratory studies and cabinet, causing that the conclusions of experts and investigative authorities, are wrong at the time of issuing their opinions or resolutions, respectively, affecting the imparting of justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (Spanish) Group: Ab Data: Introducción: El médico clínico debe conocer cómo se deben describir las lesiones y el médico forense, adscrito a la Agencia del Ministerio Público (MP), además, debe saber estructurar el certificado-dictamen de lesiones, aplicando sus conocimientos a través del método científico en el examen de personas (denunciantes e imputados) acorde con la forma que se hace en los procedimientos médico-forense y médico-clínico (con base en la propedéutica y la semiología). Su empleo le permitirá identificar, describir, interpretar, diagnosticar y emitir sus conclusiones sobre las lesiones percibidas y en la estructuración del certificado-dictamen. Tales capacidades son fundamentales en el trabajo de cualquier médico forense, no obstante, se dan los casos en los que los certificados-dictámenes se realizan de forma incompleta e inadecuada, por lo que resulta indispensable hacer una revisión de estos procedimientos. Los certificados-dictámenes constituyen una prueba determinante durante las etapas del proceso penal en la investigación de delitos de lesiones; es por ello que la elaboración deficiente de tales certificados-dictámenes puede conllevar tanto a imprecisiones durante la investigación como al descrédito del perito médico forense, así como perjudicar gravemente la interpretación jurídica de las lesiones y, por ende, a los involucrados. Conclusión: Una de las controversias provocadas por la evidencia médico-forense sobre las lesiones que presenten las personas involucradas en un juicio es su descripción inapropiada, inexacta o que el diagnóstico esté basado en síntomas sin sustento clínico ni apoyado en estudios de laboratorio y gabinete, lo que origina que las conclusiones de peritos y autoridades investigadoras resulten equivocadas al momento de emitir sus dictámenes o resoluciones, respectivamente, afectando con ello la impartición de justicia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Revista CONAMED is the property of Comision Nacional de Arbitraje Medico and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=lth&AN=156458987 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.35366/104652 Languages: – Code: spa Text: Spanish PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 StartPage: 41 Titles: – TitleFull: Certificado-dictamen de lesiones. Estudio de un caso. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: García Garduza, Ismael IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Text: ene-mar2022 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 14056704 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 27 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Revista CONAMED Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
