View in EDS PDF Full Text

HEMOPERITONEUM AFTER TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSY.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: HEMOPERITONEUM AFTER TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSY.
Alternate Title: Hemoperitoneo tras biopsia prostática transperineal.
Authors: FRASCHERI, MARÍA FLORENCIA1 mfrascheri@hospitalaleman.com, CONTRERAS, PABLO1, BLAS, LEANDRO1, BONANNO, NICOLÁS1, AMERI, CARLOS1
Source: Medicina (Buenos Aires). may/jun2022, Vol. 82 Issue 3, p452-455. 4p.
Subjects: HEMORRHAGE, PROSTATE biopsy, PROSTATE cancer, PROSTATE-specific antigen, ORTHOSTATIC hypotension
Abstract (English): Bleeding is the most common complication after a prostate biopsy, commonly self-limited. We describe a case of a patient who developed a hemoperitoneum after a transperineal prostate biopsy. A 65-year-old man with a history of prostate cancer diagnosed in 2016 by transurethral resection, with no further urologic control until 2020 when a rise in the serum prostate-specific antigen was diagnosed: 4.49 ng/ml. Prostate digital rectal examination had no pathologic findings. Magnetic resonance imaging informed anequivocal lesion. A target transperineal fusion biopsy was performed, guided by ultrasound (US). Pre-surgical blood tests, including coagulogram, were normal. No immediate postoperative complications were recorded, and the patient was discharged. Hours later, he returned after a head concussion due to orthostatic hypotension and diffuse abdominal pain. Blood test showed a drop in hematocrit and hemoglobin values. Abdominal US and abdominopelvic computed tomography scan showed free intraperitoneal fluid and intraperitoneal hematic collection on top of the bladder of 104 × 86 mm with no active bleeding. The patient was admitted to intensive care unit due to persistent hypotension despite fluid restoration. He received a single-unit blood transfusion and had a good response to vasopressors. Abdominal pain decreased. He was finally discharged with stable hematocrit 48hours after admission. Clinical management with no surgery or radiologic angio-embolization was required. We found no clear origin of the intraperitoneal bleeding, but we hypothesize that maybe the previous transurethral resection of the prostate made anatomical changes that facilitated blood passage to the abdominal cavity after puncture of branches from the inferior vesical artery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): La complicación más frecuente tras una biopsia prostática es el sangrado, generalmente autolimitado. Aquí describimos un caso de hemoperitoneo secundario a dicho procedimiento. Hombre de 65 años con antecedentes de cáncer de próstata diagnosticado en 2016 por una resección transuretral de próstata, sin seguimiento urológico, consultó en 2020 por aumento del antígeno prostático específico: 4.49 ng/ml, asociado a tacto rectal normal y una resonancia multiparamétrica de próstata mostró una lesión indeterminada. Se realizó una biopsia prostática transperineal por fusión guiado por ecografía. Los análisis preoperatorios, incluido coagulograma, eran normales. No se registraron complicaciones intraquirúrgicas y se indicó el alta. Horas más tarde, consultó al hospital por hipotensión ortostática y dolor abdominal difuso. Los análisis demostraron caída del hematocrito y hemoglobina. Una ecografía y posterior tomografía computada evidenciaron una colección supravesical de 104 × 86mm sin signos de sangrado activo. Se indicó internación en sala de cuidados intensivos debido a hipotensión refractaria a expansiones con requerimiento de vasopresores. Recibió una transfusión de glóbulos rojos. Por favorable evolución, 48 horas después del ingreso recibió el alta. En este caso, fue posible un manejo conservador, sin requerimiento de cirugía o embolización. Si bien no se encontró sitio exacto del sangrado, creemos que la resección transuretral previa podría haber generado cambios anatómicos que facilitaran el pasaje de sangre, posiblemente proveniente de ramas de la arteria vesical inferior a cavidad abdominal luego de la punción. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Medicina (Buenos Aires) is the property of Medicina (Buenos Aires) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: MedicLatina
Description
Abstract:Bleeding is the most common complication after a prostate biopsy, commonly self-limited. We describe a case of a patient who developed a hemoperitoneum after a transperineal prostate biopsy. A 65-year-old man with a history of prostate cancer diagnosed in 2016 by transurethral resection, with no further urologic control until 2020 when a rise in the serum prostate-specific antigen was diagnosed: 4.49 ng/ml. Prostate digital rectal examination had no pathologic findings. Magnetic resonance imaging informed anequivocal lesion. A target transperineal fusion biopsy was performed, guided by ultrasound (US). Pre-surgical blood tests, including coagulogram, were normal. No immediate postoperative complications were recorded, and the patient was discharged. Hours later, he returned after a head concussion due to orthostatic hypotension and diffuse abdominal pain. Blood test showed a drop in hematocrit and hemoglobin values. Abdominal US and abdominopelvic computed tomography scan showed free intraperitoneal fluid and intraperitoneal hematic collection on top of the bladder of 104 × 86 mm with no active bleeding. The patient was admitted to intensive care unit due to persistent hypotension despite fluid restoration. He received a single-unit blood transfusion and had a good response to vasopressors. Abdominal pain decreased. He was finally discharged with stable hematocrit 48hours after admission. Clinical management with no surgery or radiologic angio-embolization was required. We found no clear origin of the intraperitoneal bleeding, but we hypothesize that maybe the previous transurethral resection of the prostate made anatomical changes that facilitated blood passage to the abdominal cavity after puncture of branches from the inferior vesical artery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00257680