Reproducibilidad de parámetros radiográficos para determinar el éxito quirúrgico de fracturas de radio distal.
Saved in:
| Title: | Reproducibilidad de parámetros radiográficos para determinar el éxito quirúrgico de fracturas de radio distal. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | Reliability of radiographic parameters to determine the surgical success in distal radius fractures. |
| Authors: | N., García-González1, E., Berúmen-Nafarrate1, L., Ávila-Carrasco2, M., Martínez-Fierro2, J., Monárrez-Espino1,2 joel.monarrez@christus.mx |
| Source: | Acta Ortopédica Mexicana. Jul/Aug2022, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p216-222. 7p. |
| Abstract (English): | Introduction: distal radius fractures are the most common in upper extremities. Therefore, it is important to standardize radiographic measures for their surgical approach. This study assessed the intra/interobserver reproducibility of radiographic parameters associated with surgical success of distal radius fractures. Material and methods: retrospective cross-sectional design of secondary data extracted from clinical records. Posteroanterior and lateral X-rays of 112 distal radius fractures were assessed by two trauma specialists standardized in the measurements required to compute five parameters indicative of postoperative success: radial height, radial inclination, volar tilt, ulnar variance, and articular stepoff. The reproducibility of distances and angles was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method, calculating the mean of the difference between measurements, the range at ± 2 SD, and the proportion of measurements outside ± 2 SD. Postoperative success was also compared between patients with and without obesity according to the mean of the two measures made by each evaluator. Results: evaluator 1 had the largest intra-observer difference in radial height (0.16 mm) and the largest proportion outside ± 2 SD in ulnar variance (8.1%); evaluator 2 had the largest difference in volar tilt (1.92o) and the highest proportion in radial inclination (10.7%). The largest inter-observer difference was for ulnar variance (1.02 mm) and the largest proportion outside ± 2 SD. for radial height (5.4%). Radial tilt had the largest difference (1.41o) with 4.5% of measurements outside ± 2 SD. Ulnar variance and volar tilt had the largest difference in postoperative success between evaluators, especially in patients with obesity. Conclusion: improving the radiographic quality and standardizing the measurements results in more reproducible indicators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | Introducción: las fracturas del radio distal son las más comunes en extremidades superiores. Estandarizar las mediciones radiográficas para su abordaje quirúrgico es importante. Este estudio midió la reproducibilidad intra/interobservador de parámetros radiográficos asociados al éxito quirúrgico en estas fracturas. Material y métodos: diseño transversal retrospectivo con datos secundarios de expedientes clínicos. Se evaluaron radiografías de 112 fracturas en planos posteroanterior y lateral por dos traumatólogos estandarizados en toma de mediciones para calcular cinco parámetros indicativos de éxito postquirúrgico: altura radial, inclinación radial, inclinación volar, varianza cubital y escalón articular. La reproducibilidad de distancias y ángulos se evaluó con el método de Bland-Altman calculando: diferencia media entre mediciones, rango a ± 2 DE y proporción de mediciones fuera de ± 2 DE. El éxito postquirúrgico se comparó en pacientes con/sin obesidad según la media de las dos mediciones de cada evaluador. Resultados: el evaluador 1 tuvo la mayor diferencia intraobservador en altura radial (0.16 mm) y la mayor proporción fuera de ± 2 DE en varianza cubital (8.1%); el evaluador 2 tuvo la mayor diferencia en inclinación volar (1.92o) y la mayor proporción en inclinación radial (10.7%). La mayor diferencia interobservador fue en varianza cubital (1.02 mm) y la mayor proporción fuera de ± 2 DE en altura radial (5.4%). La inclinación radial tuvo la mayor diferencia (1.41o) con 4.5% de mediciones fuera de ± 2 DE. La varianza cubital y la inclinación volar tuvieron la mayor diferencia de éxito postquirúrgico entre evaluadores, sobre todo en pacientes con obesidad. Conclusión: mejorar la calidad radiográfica y estandarizar las mediciones resulta en indicadores más reproducibles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Acta Ortopédica Mexicana is the property of Sociedad Mexicana de Ortopedia, AC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | MedicLatina |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: lth DbLabel: MedicLatina An: 162229763 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Reproducibilidad de parámetros radiográficos para determinar el éxito quirúrgico de fracturas de radio distal. – Name: TitleAlt Label: Alternate Title Group: TiAlt Data: Reliability of radiographic parameters to determine the surgical success in distal radius fractures. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22N%2E%2C+García-González%22">N., García-González</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22E%2E%2C+Berúmen-Nafarrate%22">E., Berúmen-Nafarrate</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22L%2E%2C+Ávila-Carrasco%22">L., Ávila-Carrasco</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22M%2E%2C+Martínez-Fierro%22">M., Martínez-Fierro</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22J%2E%2C+Monárrez-Espino%22">J., Monárrez-Espino</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><i> joel.monarrez@christus.mx</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Acta+Ortopédica+Mexicana%22">Acta Ortopédica Mexicana</searchLink>. Jul/Aug2022, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p216-222. 7p. – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (English) Group: Ab Data: Introduction: distal radius fractures are the most common in upper extremities. Therefore, it is important to standardize radiographic measures for their surgical approach. This study assessed the intra/interobserver reproducibility of radiographic parameters associated with surgical success of distal radius fractures. Material and methods: retrospective cross-sectional design of secondary data extracted from clinical records. Posteroanterior and lateral X-rays of 112 distal radius fractures were assessed by two trauma specialists standardized in the measurements required to compute five parameters indicative of postoperative success: radial height, radial inclination, volar tilt, ulnar variance, and articular stepoff. The reproducibility of distances and angles was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method, calculating the mean of the difference between measurements, the range at ± 2 SD, and the proportion of measurements outside ± 2 SD. Postoperative success was also compared between patients with and without obesity according to the mean of the two measures made by each evaluator. Results: evaluator 1 had the largest intra-observer difference in radial height (0.16 mm) and the largest proportion outside ± 2 SD in ulnar variance (8.1%); evaluator 2 had the largest difference in volar tilt (1.92o) and the highest proportion in radial inclination (10.7%). The largest inter-observer difference was for ulnar variance (1.02 mm) and the largest proportion outside ± 2 SD. for radial height (5.4%). Radial tilt had the largest difference (1.41o) with 4.5% of measurements outside ± 2 SD. Ulnar variance and volar tilt had the largest difference in postoperative success between evaluators, especially in patients with obesity. Conclusion: improving the radiographic quality and standardizing the measurements results in more reproducible indicators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (Spanish) Group: Ab Data: Introducción: las fracturas del radio distal son las más comunes en extremidades superiores. Estandarizar las mediciones radiográficas para su abordaje quirúrgico es importante. Este estudio midió la reproducibilidad intra/interobservador de parámetros radiográficos asociados al éxito quirúrgico en estas fracturas. Material y métodos: diseño transversal retrospectivo con datos secundarios de expedientes clínicos. Se evaluaron radiografías de 112 fracturas en planos posteroanterior y lateral por dos traumatólogos estandarizados en toma de mediciones para calcular cinco parámetros indicativos de éxito postquirúrgico: altura radial, inclinación radial, inclinación volar, varianza cubital y escalón articular. La reproducibilidad de distancias y ángulos se evaluó con el método de Bland-Altman calculando: diferencia media entre mediciones, rango a ± 2 DE y proporción de mediciones fuera de ± 2 DE. El éxito postquirúrgico se comparó en pacientes con/sin obesidad según la media de las dos mediciones de cada evaluador. Resultados: el evaluador 1 tuvo la mayor diferencia intraobservador en altura radial (0.16 mm) y la mayor proporción fuera de ± 2 DE en varianza cubital (8.1%); el evaluador 2 tuvo la mayor diferencia en inclinación volar (1.92o) y la mayor proporción en inclinación radial (10.7%). La mayor diferencia interobservador fue en varianza cubital (1.02 mm) y la mayor proporción fuera de ± 2 DE en altura radial (5.4%). La inclinación radial tuvo la mayor diferencia (1.41o) con 4.5% de mediciones fuera de ± 2 DE. La varianza cubital y la inclinación volar tuvieron la mayor diferencia de éxito postquirúrgico entre evaluadores, sobre todo en pacientes con obesidad. Conclusión: mejorar la calidad radiográfica y estandarizar las mediciones resulta en indicadores más reproducibles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Acta Ortopédica Mexicana is the property of Sociedad Mexicana de Ortopedia, AC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=lth&AN=162229763 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.35366/109806 Languages: – Code: spa Text: Spanish PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 216 Titles: – TitleFull: Reproducibilidad de parámetros radiográficos para determinar el éxito quirúrgico de fracturas de radio distal. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: N., García-González – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: E., Berúmen-Nafarrate – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: L., Ávila-Carrasco – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: M., Martínez-Fierro – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: J., Monárrez-Espino IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Text: Jul/Aug2022 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 23064102 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 36 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Acta Ortopédica Mexicana Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
