View in EDS PDF Full Text

Construction and Validation of an Occupational Risks Scale for Intra-hospital Nursing Staff.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Construction and Validation of an Occupational Risks Scale for Intra-hospital Nursing Staff.
Alternate Title: Construcción y validación de una escala de riesgos laborales del personal de enfermería intrahospitalario.
Construção e validação de escala de risco ocupacional para equipe de enfermagem intra-hospitalar.
Authors: Cuadros-Carlesi, Katya1 katya.cuadros@uvm.cl, Henríquez-Roldán, Carlos2 carlos.henriquez@uv.cl, Meneses Ciuffardi, Elena3 elena.meneses@gmail.com, Fuentes Ibáñez, Jaime4, Ruiz-Araya, Paola5 paola.ruiz@uvm.cl
Source: Investigación & Educación en Enfermería. May-Aug2023, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p1-17. 17p.
Subjects: OCCUPATIONAL disease risk factors, WORK-related injuries risk factors, EXPERIMENTAL design, WORK environment, RESEARCH, PILOT projects, SCIENTIFIC observation, FOCUS groups, RESEARCH evaluation, NURSE administrators, RESEARCH methodology, RESEARCH methodology evaluation, CLINICAL nurse leaders, CROSS-sectional method, OCCUPATIONAL exposure, QUANTITATIVE research, INTERVIEWING, RISK assessment, QUALITATIVE research, CRONBACH'S alpha, MULTITRAIT multimethod techniques, HOSPITAL nursing staff, UNOBTRUSIVE measures, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, FACTOR analysis, RESEARCH funding, INDUSTRIAL hygiene, THEMATIC analysis
Geographic Terms: CHILE
Abstract (English): Objective. To construct and evaluate initial validity indicators of an instrument on occupational risks for hospital nursing staff. Methods. A methodological study was conducted in four Chilean hospitals. The study was carried out in three stages: (i) integrative literature review on risk assessment instruments for nursing; (ii) descriptive qualitative study on 113 health professionals to identify their work conditions and experiences regarding occupational risks and construct three instruments proposals for nursing managers, clinical nurses, and technicians; and (iii) validity and reliability study of the three instruments in 503 nurses and nursing technicians. To collect the data from the qualitative study, individual interviews, focal groups, and non-participant observation were conducted. The data were analyzed thematically into predefined risk categories. Content validation was performed through expert judgment, and exploratory factor analysis of principal components was conducted for the preliminary construct validity study. Cronbach's alpha was used as an indicator of internal consistency. Results. A total of 128 items were identified, distributed across 11 categories and 25 subcategories of occupational risks for the three instruments derived from the original proposal. After expert validation, pilot study, and instrument administration, Cronbach's alpha values between 0.88 and 0.93 were obtained. Exploratory factor analysis distinguished eight to eleven components, with unsatisfactory goodness-of-fit indicators. Conclusion. The instruments demonstrated good parameters of content validity and reliability, although their construct validity needs further improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): Objetivo. Construir y evaluar indicadores de validez inicial de un instrumento sobre riesgos laborales del personal de enfermería intrahospitalario. Métodos. Estudio metodológico, participaron cuatro hospitales chilenos. Se desarrolló en tres etapas: (i) revisión integradora de la literatura sobre instrumentos de evaluación de riesgos en enfermería; (ii) estudio cualitativo descriptivo en 113 profesionales de salud para identificar sus condiciones laborales y vivencias respecto a los riesgos laborales y construir tres propuestas de instrumentos para jefaturas de enfermería, enfermeros clínicos y técnicos; y (iii) estudio de validez y confiabilidad de los tres instrumentos en 503 enfermeros y técnicos en enfermería. Para la recolección de datos del estudio cualitativo se realizaron entrevistas individuales, grupos focales y observación no participante. Los datos fueron analizados temáticamente en categorías de riesgos predefinidas. La validación de contenido se realizó a través del juicio de expertos y para el estudio preliminar de validez de constructo se hizo análisis factorial exploratorio de componentes principales. Como indicador de la consistencia interna se aplicó Alfa de Cronbach. Resultados. Se identificaron 128 ítems para 11 categorías y 25 subcategorías de riesgos laborales para tres instrumentos derivados del originalmente propuesto. Luego de la validación por expertos, el estudio piloto y la aplicación de los instrumentos, se obtuvieron valores de alfa de Cronbach entre 0.88 y 0.93. El análisis factorial exploratorio distinguió ocho a once componentes, no lográndose buenos indicadores de bondad de ajuste. Conclusión. Los instrumentos presentan buenos parámetros de validez de contenido y confiabilidad, debiéndose perfeccionar su validez de constructo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Portuguese): Objetivo. Construir e avaliar indicadores de validade inicial de um instrumento sobre riscos ocupacionais da equipe de enfermagem intra-hospitalar. Métodos. Estudo metodológico, quatro hospitais chilenos participaram. Foi desenvolvido em três etapas: (i) revisão integrativa da literatura sobre instrumentos de avaliação de risco em enfermagem; (ii) estudo descritivo qualitativo em 113 profissionais de saúde para identificar suas condições de trabalho e experiências em relação aos riscos ocupacionais e construir três propostas de instrumentos para chefes, enfermeiros assistenciais e técnicos de enfermagem; e (iii) estudo de validade e confiabilidade dos três instrumentos em 503 enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem. Para a coleta de dados do estudo qualitativo, foram realizadas entrevistas individuais, grupos focais e observação não participante. Os dados foram analisados tematicamente em categorias de risco pré-definidas. A validação de conteúdo foi realizada por meio de julgamento de especialistas e para o estudo preliminar de validade de construto foi realizada uma análise fatorial exploratória de componentes principais. Como indicador de consistência interna, foi aplicado o Alfa de Cronbach. Resultados. Foram identificados 128 itens para 11 categorias e 25 subcategorias de riscos ocupacionais para três instrumentos derivados do originalmente proposto. Após a validação por especialistas, o estudo piloto e a aplicação dos instrumentos, foram obtidos valores de alfa de Cronbach entre 0.88 e 0.93. A análise fatorial exploratória distinguiu de oito a onze componentes, não alcançando bons indicadores de qualidade de ajuste. Conclusão. Os instrumentos apresentam bons parâmetros de validade de conteúdo e confiabilidade, e sua validade de construto deve ser aprimorada. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Investigación & Educación en Enfermería is the property of Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Enfermeria and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: MedicLatina
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: lth
DbLabel: MedicLatina
An: 164774023
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Construction and Validation of an Occupational Risks Scale for Intra-hospital Nursing Staff.
– Name: TitleAlt
  Label: Alternate Title
  Group: TiAlt
  Data: Construcción y validación de una escala de riesgos laborales del personal de enfermería intrahospitalario.<br />Construção e validação de escala de risco ocupacional para equipe de enfermagem intra-hospitalar.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cuadros-Carlesi%2C+Katya%22">Cuadros-Carlesi, Katya</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> katya.cuadros@uvm.cl</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Henríquez-Roldán%2C+Carlos%22">Henríquez-Roldán, Carlos</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> carlos.henriquez@uv.cl</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meneses+Ciuffardi%2C+Elena%22">Meneses Ciuffardi, Elena</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><i> elena.meneses@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fuentes+Ibáñez%2C+Jaime%22">Fuentes Ibáñez, Jaime</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ruiz-Araya%2C+Paola%22">Ruiz-Araya, Paola</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><i> paola.ruiz@uvm.cl</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Investigación+%26+Educación+en+Enfermería%22">Investigación & Educación en Enfermería</searchLink>. May-Aug2023, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p1-17. 17p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22OCCUPATIONAL+disease+risk+factors%22">OCCUPATIONAL disease risk factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22WORK-related+injuries+risk+factors%22">WORK-related injuries risk factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22EXPERIMENTAL+design%22">EXPERIMENTAL design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22WORK+environment%22">WORK environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RESEARCH%22">RESEARCH</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22PILOT+projects%22">PILOT projects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22SCIENTIFIC+observation%22">SCIENTIFIC observation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22FOCUS+groups%22">FOCUS groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RESEARCH+evaluation%22">RESEARCH evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22NURSE+administrators%22">NURSE administrators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RESEARCH+methodology%22">RESEARCH methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RESEARCH+methodology+evaluation%22">RESEARCH methodology evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CLINICAL+nurse+leaders%22">CLINICAL nurse leaders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CROSS-sectional+method%22">CROSS-sectional method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22OCCUPATIONAL+exposure%22">OCCUPATIONAL exposure</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22QUANTITATIVE+research%22">QUANTITATIVE research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22INTERVIEWING%22">INTERVIEWING</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RISK+assessment%22">RISK assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22QUALITATIVE+research%22">QUALITATIVE research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CRONBACH'S+alpha%22">CRONBACH'S alpha</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MULTITRAIT+multimethod+techniques%22">MULTITRAIT multimethod techniques</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22HOSPITAL+nursing+staff%22">HOSPITAL nursing staff</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22UNOBTRUSIVE+measures%22">UNOBTRUSIVE measures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22DESCRIPTIVE+statistics%22">DESCRIPTIVE statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22FACTOR+analysis%22">FACTOR analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22RESEARCH+funding%22">RESEARCH funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22INDUSTRIAL+hygiene%22">INDUSTRIAL hygiene</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22THEMATIC+analysis%22">THEMATIC analysis</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CHILE%22">CHILE</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (English)
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objective. To construct and evaluate initial validity indicators of an instrument on occupational risks for hospital nursing staff. Methods. A methodological study was conducted in four Chilean hospitals. The study was carried out in three stages: (i) integrative literature review on risk assessment instruments for nursing; (ii) descriptive qualitative study on 113 health professionals to identify their work conditions and experiences regarding occupational risks and construct three instruments proposals for nursing managers, clinical nurses, and technicians; and (iii) validity and reliability study of the three instruments in 503 nurses and nursing technicians. To collect the data from the qualitative study, individual interviews, focal groups, and non-participant observation were conducted. The data were analyzed thematically into predefined risk categories. Content validation was performed through expert judgment, and exploratory factor analysis of principal components was conducted for the preliminary construct validity study. Cronbach's alpha was used as an indicator of internal consistency. Results. A total of 128 items were identified, distributed across 11 categories and 25 subcategories of occupational risks for the three instruments derived from the original proposal. After expert validation, pilot study, and instrument administration, Cronbach's alpha values between 0.88 and 0.93 were obtained. Exploratory factor analysis distinguished eight to eleven components, with unsatisfactory goodness-of-fit indicators. Conclusion. The instruments demonstrated good parameters of content validity and reliability, although their construct validity needs further improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (Spanish)
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objetivo. Construir y evaluar indicadores de validez inicial de un instrumento sobre riesgos laborales del personal de enfermería intrahospitalario. Métodos. Estudio metodológico, participaron cuatro hospitales chilenos. Se desarrolló en tres etapas: (i) revisión integradora de la literatura sobre instrumentos de evaluación de riesgos en enfermería; (ii) estudio cualitativo descriptivo en 113 profesionales de salud para identificar sus condiciones laborales y vivencias respecto a los riesgos laborales y construir tres propuestas de instrumentos para jefaturas de enfermería, enfermeros clínicos y técnicos; y (iii) estudio de validez y confiabilidad de los tres instrumentos en 503 enfermeros y técnicos en enfermería. Para la recolección de datos del estudio cualitativo se realizaron entrevistas individuales, grupos focales y observación no participante. Los datos fueron analizados temáticamente en categorías de riesgos predefinidas. La validación de contenido se realizó a través del juicio de expertos y para el estudio preliminar de validez de constructo se hizo análisis factorial exploratorio de componentes principales. Como indicador de la consistencia interna se aplicó Alfa de Cronbach. Resultados. Se identificaron 128 ítems para 11 categorías y 25 subcategorías de riesgos laborales para tres instrumentos derivados del originalmente propuesto. Luego de la validación por expertos, el estudio piloto y la aplicación de los instrumentos, se obtuvieron valores de alfa de Cronbach entre 0.88 y 0.93. El análisis factorial exploratorio distinguió ocho a once componentes, no lográndose buenos indicadores de bondad de ajuste. Conclusión. Los instrumentos presentan buenos parámetros de validez de contenido y confiabilidad, debiéndose perfeccionar su validez de constructo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (Portuguese)
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objetivo. Construir e avaliar indicadores de validade inicial de um instrumento sobre riscos ocupacionais da equipe de enfermagem intra-hospitalar. Métodos. Estudo metodológico, quatro hospitais chilenos participaram. Foi desenvolvido em três etapas: (i) revisão integrativa da literatura sobre instrumentos de avaliação de risco em enfermagem; (ii) estudo descritivo qualitativo em 113 profissionais de saúde para identificar suas condições de trabalho e experiências em relação aos riscos ocupacionais e construir três propostas de instrumentos para chefes, enfermeiros assistenciais e técnicos de enfermagem; e (iii) estudo de validade e confiabilidade dos três instrumentos em 503 enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem. Para a coleta de dados do estudo qualitativo, foram realizadas entrevistas individuais, grupos focais e observação não participante. Os dados foram analisados tematicamente em categorias de risco pré-definidas. A validação de conteúdo foi realizada por meio de julgamento de especialistas e para o estudo preliminar de validade de construto foi realizada uma análise fatorial exploratória de componentes principais. Como indicador de consistência interna, foi aplicado o Alfa de Cronbach. Resultados. Foram identificados 128 itens para 11 categorias e 25 subcategorias de riscos ocupacionais para três instrumentos derivados do originalmente proposto. Após a validação por especialistas, o estudo piloto e a aplicação dos instrumentos, foram obtidos valores de alfa de Cronbach entre 0.88 e 0.93. A análise fatorial exploratória distinguiu de oito a onze componentes, não alcançando bons indicadores de qualidade de ajuste. Conclusão. Os instrumentos apresentam bons parâmetros de validade de conteúdo e confiabilidade, e sua validade de construto deve ser aprimorada. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Investigación & Educación en Enfermería is the property of Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Enfermeria and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=lth&AN=164774023
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e16
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 17
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: OCCUPATIONAL disease risk factors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: WORK-related injuries risk factors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: EXPERIMENTAL design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: WORK environment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: RESEARCH
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: PILOT projects
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: SCIENTIFIC observation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: FOCUS groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: RESEARCH evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: NURSE administrators
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: RESEARCH methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: RESEARCH methodology evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CLINICAL nurse leaders
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CROSS-sectional method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: OCCUPATIONAL exposure
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: QUANTITATIVE research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: INTERVIEWING
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: RISK assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: QUALITATIVE research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CRONBACH'S alpha
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: MULTITRAIT multimethod techniques
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: HOSPITAL nursing staff
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: UNOBTRUSIVE measures
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: DESCRIPTIVE statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: FACTOR analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: RESEARCH funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: INDUSTRIAL hygiene
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: THEMATIC analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CHILE
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Construction and Validation of an Occupational Risks Scale for Intra-hospital Nursing Staff.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cuadros-Carlesi, Katya
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Henríquez-Roldán, Carlos
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Meneses Ciuffardi, Elena
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fuentes Ibáñez, Jaime
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ruiz-Araya, Paola
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May-Aug2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01205307
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 41
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Investigación & Educación en Enfermería
              Type: main
ResultId 1