View in EDS PDF Full Text

Evaluación comparativa de la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados en odontología pediátrica.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Evaluación comparativa de la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados en odontología pediátrica.
Alternate Title: Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry.
Authors: Ramírez Báez, Raquel1, Márquez Preciado, Raúl2, Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo2, Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel2, Sánchez Vargas, Luis Octavio3, Ortiz Magdaleno, Marine4
Source: Odontología Pediátrica. jul-dic2022, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p14-22. 9p.
Abstract (English): Objective: The aim of this in vitro comparative study was to compare the compressive strength of three different filling restorative materials that are frequently used in pediatric dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 270 specimens (n=90 per group) of Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil, and Riva Light Cure HV® were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions. The compressive strength was tested using a crosshead speed of 0.75±0.30 mm/min along the long axis of the specimens by means of a universal test machine. The tests were performed on the specimens after 24, 48, and 72h of storage at 37ºC, with a relative air humidity of 50±10%. Data were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal- Wallis tests. Results: After the three periods of evaluation, Cention N® exhibited higher mean values (166.2±36.3 MPa at 24h, 153.8±40.2 MPa at 48h and 167.3±36.2 MPa at 72h) than EQUIA Forte® Fil and Riva Light Cure HV® (p<0.05). Between EQUIA Forte® Fill and Riva Light Cure HV® there was no significant difference (p>0.05). Compressive strength values increased only in EQUIA Forte® Fil with no significant difference after 24, 48 and 72 h. Conclusions: Cention N® showed the highest compressive strength values after 24, 48 and 72h of storage, which means that it can provide better clinical performance and mechanical behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): Objetivo: El próposito de este estudio comparativo in vitro fue comparar la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados frecuentemente en odontopediatría. Material y métodos: Un total de 270 especiménes (n=90 por grupo) de los materiales restauradores Cention N®, EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® fueron elaborados de acuerdo con las instrucciones del fabricante. Se evaluó la resistencia a la compresión a una velocidad de cruceta de 0.75±0.30 mm/min a lo largo del eje longitudinal de los especímenes utilizando la máquina universal de ensayos posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas de almacenamiento a partir de su elaboración. Los especímenes se almacenaron 37ºC con una humedad relativa de 50±10%. Los datos fueron analizados estadísticamente con las pruebas de ANOVA de una vía y Kruskal-Wallis. Resultados: Posterior a los tres periodos de almacenamiento, Cention N® obtuvo los valores más altos (166.2±36.3 MPa a 24 horas, 153.8±40.2 MPa a 48 horas y 167.3±36.2 MPa a 72 horas) versus EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® (p<0.05). Entre EQUIA Forte® Fil y Riva Light Cure HV® no se obtuvo diferencia significativa (p>0.05). Los valores de resistencia a la compresión se incrementaron solo en EQUIA Forte® Fil sin diferencia significativa posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas (p>0.05). Conclusión: Cention N® obtuvo los valores más altos de resistencia a la compresión posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas de almacenamiento, lo que puede representar un mejor comportamiento clínico y mecánico de este material restaurador. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Odontología Pediátrica is the property of Asociacion Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatria and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: MedicLatina
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: lth
DbLabel: MedicLatina
An: 172009009
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Evaluaci&#243;n comparativa de la resistencia a la compresi&#243;n de tres materiales restauradores utilizados en odontolog&#237;a pedi&#225;trica.
– Name: TitleAlt
  Label: Alternate Title
  Group: TiAlt
  Data: Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of three restorative materials employed in pediatric dentistry.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Ram&#237;rez+B&#225;ez%2C+Raquel%22&quot;&gt;Ram&#237;rez B&#225;ez, Raquel&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22M&#225;rquez+Preciado%2C+Ra&#250;l%22&quot;&gt;M&#225;rquez Preciado, Ra&#250;l&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;2&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Garrocho+Rangel%2C+Jos&#233;+Arturo%22&quot;&gt;Garrocho Rangel, Jos&#233; Arturo&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;2&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Rosales+Berber%2C+Miguel+&#193;ngel%22&quot;&gt;Rosales Berber, Miguel &#193;ngel&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;2&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22S&#225;nchez+Vargas%2C+Luis+Octavio%22&quot;&gt;S&#225;nchez Vargas, Luis Octavio&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;3&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Ortiz+Magdaleno%2C+Marine%22&quot;&gt;Ortiz Magdaleno, Marine&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;4&lt;/relatesTo&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Odontolog&#237;a+Pedi&#225;trica%22&quot;&gt;Odontolog&#237;a Pedi&#225;trica&lt;/searchLink&gt;. jul-dic2022, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p14-22. 9p.
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (English)
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objective: The aim of this in vitro comparative study was to compare the compressive strength of three different filling restorative materials that are frequently used in pediatric dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 270 specimens (n=90 per group) of Cention N&#174;, EQUIA Forte&#174; Fil, and Riva Light Cure HV&#174; were prepared following the manufacturer&#39;s instructions. The compressive strength was tested using a crosshead speed of 0.75&#177;0.30 mm/min along the long axis of the specimens by means of a universal test machine. The tests were performed on the specimens after 24, 48, and 72h of storage at 37&#186;C, with a relative air humidity of 50&#177;10%. Data were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal- Wallis tests. Results: After the three periods of evaluation, Cention N&#174; exhibited higher mean values (166.2&#177;36.3 MPa at 24h, 153.8&#177;40.2 MPa at 48h and 167.3&#177;36.2 MPa at 72h) than EQUIA Forte&#174; Fil and Riva Light Cure HV&#174; (p&lt;0.05). Between EQUIA Forte&#174; Fill and Riva Light Cure HV&#174; there was no significant difference (p&gt;0.05). Compressive strength values increased only in EQUIA Forte&#174; Fil with no significant difference after 24, 48 and 72 h. Conclusions: Cention N&#174; showed the highest compressive strength values after 24, 48 and 72h of storage, which means that it can provide better clinical performance and mechanical behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (Spanish)
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objetivo: El pr&#243;posito de este estudio comparativo in vitro fue comparar la resistencia a la compresi&#243;n de tres materiales restauradores utilizados frecuentemente en odontopediatr&#237;a. Material y m&#233;todos: Un total de 270 especim&#233;nes (n=90 por grupo) de los materiales restauradores Cention N&#174;, EQUIA Forte&#174; Fil y Riva Light Cure HV&#174; fueron elaborados de acuerdo con las instrucciones del fabricante. Se evalu&#243; la resistencia a la compresi&#243;n a una velocidad de cruceta de 0.75&#177;0.30 mm/min a lo largo del eje longitudinal de los espec&#237;menes utilizando la m&#225;quina universal de ensayos posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas de almacenamiento a partir de su elaboraci&#243;n. Los espec&#237;menes se almacenaron 37&#186;C con una humedad relativa de 50&#177;10%. Los datos fueron analizados estad&#237;sticamente con las pruebas de ANOVA de una v&#237;a y Kruskal-Wallis. Resultados: Posterior a los tres periodos de almacenamiento, Cention N&#174; obtuvo los valores m&#225;s altos (166.2&#177;36.3 MPa a 24 horas, 153.8&#177;40.2 MPa a 48 horas y 167.3&#177;36.2 MPa a 72 horas) versus EQUIA Forte&#174; Fil y Riva Light Cure HV&#174; (p&lt;0.05). Entre EQUIA Forte&#174; Fil y Riva Light Cure HV&#174; no se obtuvo diferencia significativa (p&gt;0.05). Los valores de resistencia a la compresi&#243;n se incrementaron solo en EQUIA Forte&#174; Fil sin diferencia significativa posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas (p&gt;0.05). Conclusi&#243;n: Cention N&#174; obtuvo los valores m&#225;s altos de resistencia a la compresi&#243;n posterior a 24, 48 y 72 horas de almacenamiento, lo que puede representar un mejor comportamiento cl&#237;nico y mec&#225;nico de este material restaurador. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Odontolog&#237;a Pedi&#225;trica is the property of Asociacion Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatria and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=lth&AN=172009009
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.33738/spo.v21i2.221
    Languages:
      – Code: spa
        Text: Spanish
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 14
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Evaluación comparativa de la resistencia a la compresión de tres materiales restauradores utilizados en odontología pediátrica.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ramírez Báez, Raquel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Márquez Preciado, Raúl
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Garrocho Rangel, José Arturo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rosales Berber, Miguel Ángel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sánchez Vargas, Luis Octavio
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ortiz Magdaleno, Marine
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: jul-dic2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1814487X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 21
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Odontología Pediátrica
              Type: main
ResultId 1