Eficiência, custos e tempo de protocolos de limpeza ambiental em odontologia: comparação entre EUA e Brasil -- Uma revisão sistemática.
Saved in:
| Title: | Eficiência, custos e tempo de protocolos de limpeza ambiental em odontologia: comparação entre EUA e Brasil -- Uma revisão sistemática. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | Efficiency, costs, and time of environmental cleaning protocols in dentistry: a comparison between the USA and Brazil -- A systematic review. Eficiencia, costos y tiempo de los protocolos de limpieza ambiental en odontología: una comparación entre Estados Unidos y Brasil -- Una revisión sistemática. |
| Authors: | de Alcântara Neves Campos, Pedro1 pedroancampos@gmail.com |
| Source: | Scire Salutis. ago-dez 2025, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p1-7. 7p. |
| Subjects: | DENTISTRY, COST, ENVIRONMENTAL remediation, TIME, BRAZILIANS, ECONOMIC efficiency, COUNTRIES |
| Geographic Terms: | UNITED States, BRAZIL |
| Abstract (English): | Objective: To compare efficiency, time, cost, and adherence of environmental cleaning protocols in dentistry between the United States (USA) and Brazil. Methods: Systematic review (PRISMA 2020) in PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, EPA, ANVISA, CDC, and CFO (2018-2025). In vitro, clinical studies, and guidelines were included. Independent screening, quality assessed by AMSTAR-2/ROBINS-I. Results: 428 records identified; 28 studies included (15 USA, 10 Brazil). USA: 6.4 min, 99.1% bacterial reduction, US$0.13/m², 94% adherence, 73% HEPA/UV use. Brazil: 14.8 min, 93.8% reduction, R$0.10/m², 71% adherence, 20% technology use. Survey confirmed: 100% USA use spray <10 min; 80% Brazil use manual cleaning >12 min. Conclusion: U.S. protocols are faster and more effective but costly. Brazilian protocols are affordable but time-consuming with low adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | Objetivo: Comparar la eficiencia, el tiempo, el costo y la adherencia de los protocolos de limpieza ambiental en odontología entre Estados Unidos (EE. UU.) y Brasil. Métodos: Revisión sistemática (PRISMA 2020) en PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, EPA, ANVISA, CDC y CFO (2018-2025). Se incluyeron estudios in vitro, clínicos y basados en guías de práctica clínica. Selección independiente y evaluación de la calidad mediante AMSTAR-2/ROBINS-I. Resultados: Se identificaron 428 registros; se incluyeron 28 estudios (15 de EE. UU. y 10 de Brasil). EE. UU.: tiempo 6,4 min, reducción bacteriana 99,1 %, costo US$0,13/m², adherencia 94 %, 73 % con HEPA/UV. Brasil: tiempo 14,8 min, reducción 93,8 %, costo R$0,10/m², adherencia 71 %, 20 % con tecnología. La encuesta confirmó que el 100 % de los profesionales en EE. UU. utilizan aerosoles en menos de 10 minutos. En Brasil, el 80 % de los casos requieren limpieza manual durante más de 12 minutos. Conclusión: Los protocolos estadounidenses son más rápidos y eficaces, pero costosos. Los protocolos brasileños son accesibles, pero requieren mucho tiempo y presentan baja adherencia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Portuguese): | Objetivo: Comparar eficiência, tempo, custo e adesão de protocolos de limpeza ambiental em odontologia entre Estados Unidos (EUA) e Brasil. Métodos: Revisão sistemática (PRISMA 2020) em PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, EPA, ANVISA, CDC e CFO (2018-2025). Incluíram-se estudos in vitro, clínicos e diretrizes. Triagem independente, qualidade por AMSTAR-2/ROBINS-I. Resultados: Identificados 428 registros; 28 estudos incluídos (15 EUA, 10 BR). EUA: tempo 6,4 min, redução bacteriana 99,1%, custo US$0,13/m², adesão 94%, 73% com HEPA/UV. Brasil: tempo 14,8 min, redução 93,8%, custo R$0,10/m², adesão 71%, 20% com tecnologia. Survey confirmou: 100% EUA usam spray <10 min; 80% Brasil, limpeza manual >12 min. Conclusão: Protocolos americanos são mais rápidos e eficazes, mas caros. Brasileiros são acessíveis, mas demorados e com baixa adesão. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Scire Salutis is the property of CBPC - Companhia Brasileira de Producao Cientifica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | MedicLatina |
| Abstract: | Objective: To compare efficiency, time, cost, and adherence of environmental cleaning protocols in dentistry between the United States (USA) and Brazil. Methods: Systematic review (PRISMA 2020) in PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, EPA, ANVISA, CDC, and CFO (2018-2025). In vitro, clinical studies, and guidelines were included. Independent screening, quality assessed by AMSTAR-2/ROBINS-I. Results: 428 records identified; 28 studies included (15 USA, 10 Brazil). USA: 6.4 min, 99.1% bacterial reduction, US$0.13/m², 94% adherence, 73% HEPA/UV use. Brazil: 14.8 min, 93.8% reduction, R$0.10/m², 71% adherence, 20% technology use. Survey confirmed: 100% USA use spray <10 min; 80% Brazil use manual cleaning >12 min. Conclusion: U.S. protocols are faster and more effective but costly. Brazilian protocols are affordable but time-consuming with low adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 22369600 |
| DOI: | 10.6008/CBPC2236-9600.2025.004.0007 |
