APA (7th ed.) Citation

RL, S., RD, B., RR, B., KD, N., C, M., N, L., . . . D, R. (1999). Evaluation of the postoperative meniscus of the knee: A study comparing conventional arthrography, conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography with iodinated contrast material, and MR arthrography with gadolinium-based contrast material. Skeletal radiology, 28(9), 508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050554

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

RL, Sciulli, Boutin RD, Brown RR, Nguyen KD, Muhle C, Lektrakul N, Pathria MN, Pedowitz R, and Resnick D. "Evaluation of the Postoperative Meniscus of the Knee: A Study Comparing Conventional Arthrography, Conventional MR Imaging, MR Arthrography with Iodinated Contrast Material, and MR Arthrography with Gadolinium-based Contrast Material." Skeletal Radiology 28, no. 9 (1999): 508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050554.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

RL, Sciulli, et al. "Evaluation of the Postoperative Meniscus of the Knee: A Study Comparing Conventional Arthrography, Conventional MR Imaging, MR Arthrography with Iodinated Contrast Material, and MR Arthrography with Gadolinium-based Contrast Material." Skeletal Radiology, vol. 28, no. 9, 1999, p. 508, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050554.