APA (7th ed.) Citation

TP, S., RK, M., JJ, L., CJ, W., MB, K., & MF, B. (2004). A comparison of RANZCR and Singapore-designed radiation oncology practice audit instruments: How does reproducibility affect future approaches to revalidation? Australasian radiology, 48(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01296.x

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

TP, Shakespeare, Mukherjee RK, Lu JJ, Wynne CJ, Kumar MB, and Back MF. "A Comparison of RANZCR and Singapore-designed Radiation Oncology Practice Audit Instruments: How Does Reproducibility Affect Future Approaches to Revalidation?" Australasian Radiology 48, no. 2 (2004): 195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01296.x.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

TP, Shakespeare, et al. "A Comparison of RANZCR and Singapore-designed Radiation Oncology Practice Audit Instruments: How Does Reproducibility Affect Future Approaches to Revalidation?" Australasian Radiology, vol. 48, no. 2, 2004, p. 195, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01296.x.