APA (7th ed.) Citation

KH, B., W, C., J, H., S, B., S, G., JP, F., . . . T, R. (2005). The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: A study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine, 30(4), 455. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000153393.82368.6b

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

KH, Bridwell, et al. "The Validity of the SRS-22 Instrument in an Adult Spinal Deformity Population Compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: A Study of Response Distribution, Concurrent Validity, Internal Consistency, and Reliability." Spine 30, no. 4 (2005): 455. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000153393.82368.6b.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

KH, Bridwell, et al. "The Validity of the SRS-22 Instrument in an Adult Spinal Deformity Population Compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: A Study of Response Distribution, Concurrent Validity, Internal Consistency, and Reliability." Spine, vol. 30, no. 4, 2005, p. 455, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000153393.82368.6b.