APA (7th ed.) Citation

GS, S., P, M., AD, F., KA, G., S, P., GJ, P., . . . JA, O. (2010). Costs and consequences of automated algorithms versus manual grading for the detection of referable diabetic retinopathy. The British journal of ophthalmology, 94(6), 712. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.151126

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

GS, Scotland, et al. "Costs and Consequences of Automated Algorithms Versus Manual Grading for the Detection of Referable Diabetic Retinopathy." The British Journal of Ophthalmology 94, no. 6 (2010): 712. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.151126.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

GS, Scotland, et al. "Costs and Consequences of Automated Algorithms Versus Manual Grading for the Detection of Referable Diabetic Retinopathy." The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 94, no. 6, 2010, p. 712, https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.151126.