APA (7th ed.) Citation

AY, K., AM, T., M, O., O, A., & O, G. (2011). A comparison of endonasal with external dacryocystorhinostomy in revision cases. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 268(3), 377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1339-3

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

AY, Korkut, Teker AM, Ozsutcu M, Askiner O, and Gedikli O. "A Comparison of Endonasal with External Dacryocystorhinostomy in Revision Cases." European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology : Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : Affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 268, no. 3 (2011): 377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1339-3.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

AY, Korkut, et al. "A Comparison of Endonasal with External Dacryocystorhinostomy in Revision Cases." European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology : Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : Affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 268, no. 3, 2011, p. 377, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1339-3.