APA (7th ed.) Citation

AJ, K., C, E., LV, O., D, B., AP, R., D, H., . . . R, R. (2010). Side-by-side comparison of field monitoring methods for hot bitumen emission exposures: The German IFA Method 6305, U.S. NIOSH Method 5042, and the Total Organic Matter Method. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 7(12), 712. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2010.529792

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

AJ, Kriech, Emmel C, Osborn LV, Breuer D, Redman AP, Hoeber D, Bochmann F, and Ruehl R. "Side-by-side Comparison of Field Monitoring Methods for Hot Bitumen Emission Exposures: The German IFA Method 6305, U.S. NIOSH Method 5042, and the Total Organic Matter Method." Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 7, no. 12 (2010): 712. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2010.529792.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

AJ, Kriech, et al. "Side-by-side Comparison of Field Monitoring Methods for Hot Bitumen Emission Exposures: The German IFA Method 6305, U.S. NIOSH Method 5042, and the Total Organic Matter Method." Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, vol. 7, no. 12, 2010, p. 712, https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2010.529792.