APA (7th ed.) Citation

HM, K., MG, K., SH, B., KH, K., EK, Y., SK, L., & SG, Y. (2012). Comparison of the clinical relevance of traditional and new classification systems of temporal bone fractures. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 269(8), 1893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1849-7

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

HM, Kang, Kim MG, Boo SH, Kim KH, Yeo EK, Lee SK, and Yeo SG. "Comparison of the Clinical Relevance of Traditional and New Classification Systems of Temporal Bone Fractures." European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology : Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : Affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 269, no. 8 (2012): 1893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1849-7.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

HM, Kang, et al. "Comparison of the Clinical Relevance of Traditional and New Classification Systems of Temporal Bone Fractures." European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology : Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : Affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 269, no. 8, 2012, p. 1893, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1849-7.