FA, V., G, R., DS, H., & PP, N. (2013). Decreased maximum flow rate during intubated flow is not only due to urethral catheter in situ. International urogynecology journal, 24(3), 461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1856-2
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationFA, Valentini, Robain G, Hennebelle DS, and Nelson PP. "Decreased Maximum Flow Rate During Intubated Flow Is Not Only Due to Urethral Catheter in Situ." International Urogynecology Journal 24, no. 3 (2013): 461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1856-2.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationFA, Valentini, et al. "Decreased Maximum Flow Rate During Intubated Flow Is Not Only Due to Urethral Catheter in Situ." International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, 2013, p. 461, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1856-2.