APA (7th ed.) Citation

CL, K., AA, R., EF, W., & SE, H. (2014). Neurologist versus machine: Is the pupillometer better than the naked eye in detecting pupillary reactivity. Neurocritical care, 21(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-014-9988-5

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

CL, Kramer, Rabinstein AA, Wijdicks EF, and Hocker SE. "Neurologist Versus Machine: Is the Pupillometer Better than the Naked Eye in Detecting Pupillary Reactivity." Neurocritical Care 21, no. 2 (2014): 309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-014-9988-5.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

CL, Kramer, et al. "Neurologist Versus Machine: Is the Pupillometer Better than the Naked Eye in Detecting Pupillary Reactivity." Neurocritical Care, vol. 21, no. 2, 2014, p. 309, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-014-9988-5.