APA (7th ed.) Citation

K, D., AD, A., VA, M., SL, G., A, M., M, D., . . . NM, d. (2016). Comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (IA/IB1) uterine cervical cancer. European radiology, 26(4), 941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3899-5

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

K, Downey, Attygalle AD, Morgan VA, Giles SL, MacDonald A, Davis M, Ind TE, Shepherd JH, and deSouza NM. "Comparison of Optimised Endovaginal Vs External Array Coil T2-weighted and Diffusion-weighted Imaging Techniques for Detecting Suspected Early Stage (IA/IB1) Uterine Cervical Cancer." European Radiology 26, no. 4 (2016): 941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3899-5.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

K, Downey, et al. "Comparison of Optimised Endovaginal Vs External Array Coil T2-weighted and Diffusion-weighted Imaging Techniques for Detecting Suspected Early Stage (IA/IB1) Uterine Cervical Cancer." European Radiology, vol. 26, no. 4, 2016, p. 941, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3899-5.