APA (7th ed.) Citation

EM, K., MJ, N., AE, v. E., TL, J., & WJ, T. (2016). Discrepancies in how the impact of gout is assessed in outcomes research compared to how health professionals view the impact of gout, using the lens of the International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability (ICF). Clinical rheumatology, 35(9), 2259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-016-3325-7

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

EM, Kool, Nijsten MJ, van Ede AE, Jansen TL, and Taylor WJ. "Discrepancies in How the Impact of Gout Is Assessed in Outcomes Research Compared to How Health Professionals View the Impact of Gout, Using the Lens of the International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability (ICF)." Clinical Rheumatology 35, no. 9 (2016): 2259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-016-3325-7.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

EM, Kool, et al. "Discrepancies in How the Impact of Gout Is Assessed in Outcomes Research Compared to How Health Professionals View the Impact of Gout, Using the Lens of the International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability (ICF)." Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 35, no. 9, 2016, p. 2259, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-016-3325-7.