Safety and Effectiveness of Percutaneously Inserted Peritoneal Ports Compared to Surgically Inserted Ports in a Retrospective Study of 87 Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma over a 10-Year Period.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Safety and Effectiveness of Percutaneously Inserted Peritoneal Ports Compared to Surgically Inserted Ports in a Retrospective Study of 87 Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma over a 10-Year Period.
Authors: Woodley-Cook J; Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Scarborough Hospital, 3030 Lawrence Street East, Scarborough, ON, M1P 2T7, Canada. jwoodleycook@gmail.com., Tarulli E; Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada., Tan KT; Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada., Rajan DK; Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada., Simons ME; Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Source: Cardiovascular and interventional radiology [Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol] 2016 Nov; Vol. 39 (11), pp. 1629-1635. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jul 27.
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article
Journal Info: Publisher: Springer Verlag Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8003538 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-086X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 01741551 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Subsets: MEDLINE
Database: MEDLINE Ultimate
Description
ISSN:1432-086X
DOI:10.1007/s00270-016-1433-z