APA (7th ed.) Citation

LR, P., WC, S., MA, d. O. S., BF, G., AR, C., & M, G. P. C. (2017). Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, 32(4), 741. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5311

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

LR, Pinheiro, Scarfe WC, de Oliveira Sales MA, Gaia BF, Cortes AR, and Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti M. "Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study." The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 32, no. 4 (2017): 741. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5311.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

LR, Pinheiro, et al. "Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study." The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 32, no. 4, 2017, p. 741, https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5311.