APA (7th ed.) Citation

K, C., T, Q., R, L., A, D., B, O., K, S., . . . GD, P. (2018). Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a non-shockable rhythm: A randomised controlled feasibility trial (COMPRESS-RCT). Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 26(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0538-6

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

K, Couper, Quinn T, Lall R, Devrell A, Orriss B, Seers K, Yeung J, and Perkins GD. "Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compressions in the Treatment of In-hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in a Non-shockable Rhythm: A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial (COMPRESS-RCT)." Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 26, no. 1 (2018): 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0538-6.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

K, Couper, et al. "Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compressions in the Treatment of In-hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in a Non-shockable Rhythm: A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial (COMPRESS-RCT)." Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, vol. 26, no. 1, 2018, p. 70, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0538-6.