APA (7th ed.) Citation

V, S., C, B., J, N., S, H., DJ, M., MJ, W., . . . D, D. (2019). Authors' reply re: Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart in low-risk pregnancy during evaluation for possible labour admission-a multicentre randomised trial: the ADCAR trial. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 126(3), 429. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15491

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

V, Smith, et al. "Authors' Reply Re: Admission Cardiotocography Versus Intermittent Auscultation of the Fetal Heart in Low-risk Pregnancy During Evaluation for Possible Labour Admission-a Multicentre Randomised Trial: The ADCAR Trial." BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 126, no. 3 (2019): 429. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15491.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

V, Smith, et al. "Authors' Reply Re: Admission Cardiotocography Versus Intermittent Auscultation of the Fetal Heart in Low-risk Pregnancy During Evaluation for Possible Labour Admission-a Multicentre Randomised Trial: The ADCAR Trial." BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 126, no. 3, 2019, p. 429, https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15491.