APA (7th ed.) Citation

R, G. F., P, K., B, W., N, N., J, R., J, A., & JM, T. (2020). Comparison of residual shunt rate and complications across 6 different closure devices for patent foramen ovale. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 95(3), 365. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28527

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

R, Gevorgyan Fleming, Kumar P, West B, Noureddin N, Rusheen J, Aboulhosn J, and Tobis JM. "Comparison of Residual Shunt Rate and Complications Across 6 Different Closure Devices for Patent Foramen Ovale." Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 95, no. 3 (2020): 365. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28527.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

R, Gevorgyan Fleming, et al. "Comparison of Residual Shunt Rate and Complications Across 6 Different Closure Devices for Patent Foramen Ovale." Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, vol. 95, no. 3, 2020, p. 365, https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28527.