APA (7th ed.) Citation

F, P., MA, T., F, D. T., J, T., C, P., M, M., . . . M, S. (2020). LI-RADS 4 or 5 categorization may not be clinically relevant for decision-making processes: A prospective cohort study. Annals of hepatology, 19(6), 662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2020.06.007

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

F, Piñero, et al. "LI-RADS 4 or 5 Categorization May Not Be Clinically Relevant for Decision-making Processes: A Prospective Cohort Study." Annals of Hepatology 19, no. 6 (2020): 662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2020.06.007.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

F, Piñero, et al. "LI-RADS 4 or 5 Categorization May Not Be Clinically Relevant for Decision-making Processes: A Prospective Cohort Study." Annals of Hepatology, vol. 19, no. 6, 2020, p. 662, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2020.06.007.