C, S. (2022). Editorial commentary: Deep learning in cardiology: All models are wrong, but some are useful. Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 32(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2020.12.001
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationC, Stultz. "Editorial Commentary: Deep Learning in Cardiology: All Models Are Wrong, but Some Are Useful." Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 32, no. 1 (2022): 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2020.12.001.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationC, Stultz. "Editorial Commentary: Deep Learning in Cardiology: All Models Are Wrong, but Some Are Useful." Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 32, no. 1, 2022, p. 42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2020.12.001.
Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.