APA (7th ed.) Citation

TM, M., A, G., D, S., J, J., TR, G., P, T., . . . AU, K. (2022). Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging. European urology oncology, 5(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.006

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

TM, Ma, et al. "Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging." European Urology Oncology 5, no. 1 (2022): 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.006.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

TM, Ma, et al. "Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging." European Urology Oncology, vol. 5, no. 1, 2022, p. 100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.006.