Y, U., K, Y., S, L., A, K., M, T., M, R., . . . L, R. (2021). Discordance in the diagnostic assessment of vulnerable plaques between radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography among patients with acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the IBIS-4 study. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 37(10), 2839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02272-6
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationY, Ueki, et al. "Discordance in the Diagnostic Assessment of Vulnerable Plaques Between Radiofrequency Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography Among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights from the IBIS-4 Study." The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 37, no. 10 (2021): 2839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02272-6.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationY, Ueki, et al. "Discordance in the Diagnostic Assessment of Vulnerable Plaques Between Radiofrequency Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography Among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights from the IBIS-4 Study." The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 37, no. 10, 2021, p. 2839, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02272-6.
