Comparing the impact of the method of adjustment and forced-choice methodologies on subjective visual vertical bias and variability.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparing the impact of the method of adjustment and forced-choice methodologies on subjective visual vertical bias and variability. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Lim K; Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Arizona, USA., Teaford M; Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA., Merfeld DM; Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA. |
| Source: | Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation [J Vestib Res] 2022; Vol. 32 (6), pp. 501-510. |
| Publication Type: | Journal Article |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: SAGE Publications Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9104163 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1878-6464 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09574271 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Vestib Res Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Database: | MEDLINE Ultimate |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| ISSN: | 1878-6464 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.3233/VES-220046 |
