APA (7th ed.) Citation

JL, M., ML, M., JR, P., MJ, R., JS, S., JM, H., & JM, T. (2024). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis Demonstrates Improved Reliability in Measuring Shoulder Glenoid Bone Loss Using a Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique Compared to the "Best-fit Circle". Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 40(3), 666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.06.048

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

JL, Makovicka, Moore ML, Pollock JR, Rodriguez MJ, Shaha JS, Haglin JM, and Tokish JM. "Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis Demonstrates Improved Reliability in Measuring Shoulder Glenoid Bone Loss Using a Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique Compared to the "Best-fit Circle"." Arthroscopy : The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery : Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association 40, no. 3 (2024): 666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.06.048.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

JL, Makovicka, et al. "Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis Demonstrates Improved Reliability in Measuring Shoulder Glenoid Bone Loss Using a Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique Compared to the "Best-fit Circle"." Arthroscopy : The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery : Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, vol. 40, no. 3, 2024, p. 666, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.06.048.