APA (7th ed.) Citation

T, W., LS, B., SK, M., JB, H., TCH, M., CLA, D., . . . BC, M. (2024). Image Quality and Radiation Exposure in Abdominal Angiography: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Conventional Detector-Dose-Driven Versus Contrast-to-Noise Ratio-Driven Exposure Control at Various Source-to-Image Receptor Distances and Collimations in a Pilot Phantom and Animal Study. Investigative radiology, 59(10), 711. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001079

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

T, Werncke, et al. "Image Quality and Radiation Exposure in Abdominal Angiography: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Conventional Detector-Dose-Driven Versus Contrast-to-Noise Ratio-Driven Exposure Control at Various Source-to-Image Receptor Distances and Collimations in a Pilot Phantom and Animal Study." Investigative Radiology 59, no. 10 (2024): 711. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001079.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

T, Werncke, et al. "Image Quality and Radiation Exposure in Abdominal Angiography: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Conventional Detector-Dose-Driven Versus Contrast-to-Noise Ratio-Driven Exposure Control at Various Source-to-Image Receptor Distances and Collimations in a Pilot Phantom and Animal Study." Investigative Radiology, vol. 59, no. 10, 2024, p. 711, https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001079.