APA (7th ed.) Citation

N, A., L, M., J, B., R, A., M, P., N, D., . . . MS, H. (2024). Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) vs. bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 24(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00702-x

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

N, Ayati, McIntosh L, Buteau J, Alipour R, Pudis M, Daw N, Jackson P, and Hofman MS. "Comparison of Quantitative Whole Body PET Parameters on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Using Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) Vs. Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) Reconstruction Algorithms in Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer." Cancer Imaging : The Official Publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society 24, no. 1 (2024): 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00702-x.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

N, Ayati, et al. "Comparison of Quantitative Whole Body PET Parameters on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Using Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) Vs. Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) Reconstruction Algorithms in Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer." Cancer Imaging : The Official Publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, vol. 24, no. 1, 2024, p. 57, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00702-x.