APA (7th ed.) Citation

I, B., I, Y., S, M., MH, A., V, K., C, B., . . . JE, S. (2024). Comparison of 96-kV and 120-kV cone-beam CT for the assessment of cochlear implants. BMC medical imaging, 24(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01322-4

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

I, Burck, et al. "Comparison of 96-kV and 120-kV Cone-beam CT for the Assessment of Cochlear Implants." BMC Medical Imaging 24, no. 1 (2024): 145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01322-4.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

I, Burck, et al. "Comparison of 96-kV and 120-kV Cone-beam CT for the Assessment of Cochlear Implants." BMC Medical Imaging, vol. 24, no. 1, 2024, p. 145, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01322-4.