APA (7th ed.) Citation

M, F., P, C., P, M., G, P., E, B., F, R., . . . M, R. (2024). Vitrectomy in Small idiopathic MAcuLar hoLe (SMALL) study: Conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap. Eye (London, England), 38(17), 3334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03301-z

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

M, Fallico, Caselgrandi P, Marolo P, Parisi G, Borrelli E, Ricardi F, Gelormini F, Ceroni L, and Reibaldi M. "Vitrectomy in Small Idiopathic MAcuLar HoLe (SMALL) Study: Conventional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Versus Inverted Flap." Eye (London, England) 38, no. 17 (2024): 3334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03301-z.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

M, Fallico, et al. "Vitrectomy in Small Idiopathic MAcuLar HoLe (SMALL) Study: Conventional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Versus Inverted Flap." Eye (London, England), vol. 38, no. 17, 2024, p. 3334, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03301-z.