APA (7th ed.) Citation

BK, A., M, S., L, M., G, C., T, R., BE, S., . . . NR, H. (2024). Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for coronary revascularisation guidance (FAVOR III Europe): A multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, England), 404(10465), 1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02175-5

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

BK, Andersen, et al. "Quantitative Flow Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve for Coronary Revascularisation Guidance (FAVOR III Europe): A Multicentre, Randomised, Non-inferiority Trial." Lancet (London, England) 404, no. 10465 (2024): 1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02175-5.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

BK, Andersen, et al. "Quantitative Flow Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve for Coronary Revascularisation Guidance (FAVOR III Europe): A Multicentre, Randomised, Non-inferiority Trial." Lancet (London, England), vol. 404, no. 10465, 2024, p. 1835, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02175-5.