APA (7th ed.) Citation

M, F., D, K., E, S., D, S., C, N., A, C., . . . D, S. (2024). Synthetic vs. biologic mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction in contaminated surgical fields. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 29(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03239-x

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

M, Frountzas, et al. "Synthetic Vs. Biologic Mesh for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Contaminated Surgical Fields. A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies." Hernia : The Journal of Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery 29, no. 1 (2024): 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03239-x.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

M, Frountzas, et al. "Synthetic Vs. Biologic Mesh for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Contaminated Surgical Fields. A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies." Hernia : The Journal of Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery, vol. 29, no. 1, 2024, p. 43, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03239-x.