Reliability and validity of four cognitive interpretation bias measures in the context of social anxiety.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Reliability and validity of four cognitive interpretation bias measures in the context of social anxiety.
Authors: Duken SB; Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. sascha_duken@web.de., Moriya J; Faculty of Sociology, Kansai University, Suita, Japan., Hirsch C; Department of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK.; Center for Anxiety Disorders & Trauma, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK., Woud ML; Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.; Mental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany., van Bockstaele B; Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.; Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Centre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia., Salemink E; Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Source: Behavior research methods [Behav Res Methods] 2025 Jan 07; Vol. 57 (1), pp. 48. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Jan 07.
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Info: Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101244316 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1554-3528 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1554351X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Behav Res Methods Subsets: MEDLINE
Database: MEDLINE Ultimate
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
ISSN:1554-3528
DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02576-0