N, E., AK, M., R, C., A, S., WB, J., DW, C., . . . N, D. (2025). Implementation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the Neck Disability Index Is Often Problematic: A Methodological Review. Spine, 50(24), E499. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005300
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationN, Evaniew, Malholtra AK, Charest-Morin R, Soroceanu A, Jacobs WB, Cadotte DW, McIntosh G, and Dea N. "Implementation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the Neck Disability Index Is Often Problematic: A Methodological Review." Spine 50, no. 24 (2025): E499. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005300.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationN, Evaniew, et al. "Implementation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the Neck Disability Index Is Often Problematic: A Methodological Review." Spine, vol. 50, no. 24, 2025, p. E499, https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005300.