Alternatives to default shrinkage methods can improve prediction accuracy, calibration, and coverage: A methods comparison study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Alternatives to default shrinkage methods can improve prediction accuracy, calibration, and coverage: A methods comparison study.
Authors: van de Wiel MA; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Leday GG; Biometris, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands., Heymans MW; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., van Zwet EW; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands., Zwinderman AH; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Hoogland J; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Source: Statistical methods in medical research [Stat Methods Med Res] 2025 Jul; Vol. 34 (7), pp. 1342-1355. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 May 29.
Publication Type: Journal Article; Comparative Study
Journal Info: Publisher: SAGE Publications Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9212457 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1477-0334 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09622802 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Stat Methods Med Res Subsets: MEDLINE
Database: MEDLINE Ultimate
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: mdl
DbLabel: MEDLINE Ultimate
An: 40437980
AccessLevel: 2
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Alternatives to default shrinkage methods can improve prediction accuracy, calibration, and coverage: A methods comparison study.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22van+de+Wiel+MA%22">van de Wiel MA</searchLink>; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Leday+GG%22">Leday GG</searchLink>; Biometris, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Heymans+MW%22">Heymans MW</searchLink>; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22van+Zwet+EW%22">van Zwet EW</searchLink>; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Zwinderman+AH%22">Zwinderman AH</searchLink>; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Hoogland+J%22">Hoogland J</searchLink>; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%229212457%22">Statistical methods in medical research</searchLink> [Stat Methods Med Res] 2025 Jul; Vol. 34 (7), pp. 1342-1355. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2025 May 29.
– Name: TypePub
  Label: Publication Type
  Group: TypPub
  Data: Journal Article; Comparative Study
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Journal Info
  Group: Src
  Data: <i>Publisher: </i><searchLink fieldCode="PB" term="%22SAGE+Publications%22">SAGE Publications </searchLink><i>Country of Publication: </i>England <i>NLM ID: </i>9212457 <i>Publication Model: </i>Print-Electronic <i>Cited Medium: </i>Internet <i>ISSN: </i>1477-0334 (Electronic) <i>Linking ISSN: </i><searchLink fieldCode="IS" term="%2209622802%22">09622802 </searchLink><i>NLM ISO Abbreviation: </i>Stat Methods Med Res <i>Subsets: </i>MEDLINE
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=mdl&AN=40437980
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/09622802251338440
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        StartPage: 1342
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Alternatives to default shrinkage methods can improve prediction accuracy, calibration, and coverage: A methods comparison study.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van de Wiel MA
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Leday GG
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Heymans MW
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van Zwet EW
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zwinderman AH
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hoogland J
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: 2025 Jul
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1477-0334
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 34
            – Type: issue
              Value: 7
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Statistical methods in medical research
              Type: main
ResultId 1