APA (7th ed.) Citation

R, D., M, V., L, P., P, C., & N, D. (2025). Comparison of synthetic LGE with optimal inversion time vs. conventional LGE via representation learning: Quantification of Bias in Population Analysis. Computers in biology and medicine, 196(Pt B), 110643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

R, Deleat-Besson, Viallon M, Petrusca L, Croisille P, and Duchateau N. "Comparison of Synthetic LGE with Optimal Inversion Time Vs. Conventional LGE via Representation Learning: Quantification of Bias in Population Analysis." Computers in Biology and Medicine 196, no. Pt B (2025): 110643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

R, Deleat-Besson, et al. "Comparison of Synthetic LGE with Optimal Inversion Time Vs. Conventional LGE via Representation Learning: Quantification of Bias in Population Analysis." Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 196, no. Pt B, 2025, p. 110643, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643.

Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.