XY, M., TY, H., DP, Z., D, C., B, L., Y, Z., . . . H, Y. (2026). Comparison of locking plate alone and locking plate combined with 3D printed polymethylmethacrylate augmentation in treating proximal humerus fractures in elderly. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 35(3), 775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.08.001
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationXY, Ma, Han TY, Zhou DP, Cui D, Liu B, Zhao Y, Xue HP, Yu HL, and Yuan H. "Comparison of Locking Plate Alone and Locking Plate Combined with 3D Printed Polymethylmethacrylate Augmentation in Treating Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly." Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 35, no. 3 (2026): 775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.08.001.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationXY, Ma, et al. "Comparison of Locking Plate Alone and Locking Plate Combined with 3D Printed Polymethylmethacrylate Augmentation in Treating Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly." Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 35, no. 3, 2026, p. 775, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.08.001.