R, C., L, H., S, B., S, B., J, G., F, M., . . . N, M. (2026). Large-bore mechanical thrombectomy vs standard of care for acute high-risk pulmonary embolism: Rationale and design of the PERSEVERE randomized controlled trial. American heart journal, 294, 107331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107331
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationR, Chopard, et al. "Large-bore Mechanical Thrombectomy Vs Standard of Care for Acute High-risk Pulmonary Embolism: Rationale and Design of the PERSEVERE Randomized Controlled Trial." American Heart Journal 294 (2026): 107331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107331.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationR, Chopard, et al. "Large-bore Mechanical Thrombectomy Vs Standard of Care for Acute High-risk Pulmonary Embolism: Rationale and Design of the PERSEVERE Randomized Controlled Trial." American Heart Journal, vol. 294, 2026, p. 107331, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107331.