Comparing snowball sampling and RDS: A methodology and case study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparing snowball sampling and RDS: A methodology and case study.
Authors: Kim D; Integrative Biology Department, University of Texas Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America., Gile KJ; Mathematics and Statistics Departments, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America., Mathers B; UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland., Mirandola M; Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy., Gios L; Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy., Toskin I; UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland., Sabin KM; UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland.
Source: PloS one [PLoS One] 2026 Jan 14; Vol. 21 (1), pp. e0331666. Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Jan 14 (Print Publication: 2026).
Publication Type: Journal Article; Comparative Study
Journal Info: Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
Database: MEDLINE Ultimate
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
ISSN:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0331666